search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
…ARB LABS


RFID is very effective at curbing counterfeiting, it’s expensive and difficult to deploy across all games for the purposes of bet recognition. There used to be an optical solution called MindPlay that was acquired by Bally Technologies. It placed cameras on the table to read and recognise bets placed, but camera technology was not as robust as it is today. Also, like RFID, it required a special set of chips which is a sizeable investment for the operator. That’s an area where we are different: the tableViz with chipVue solution includes highly accurate camera technology and works with the operators existing rack of casino chips.


CI: Exactly how big a problem is this – how


important is accuracy? Justin: We were installed at a property in the U.S. for five months, with our system running parallel to their manual input rating product. We pulled data from both for a side-by-side comparison to show the operator what the variance in ratings was. We found the ratings that were manually input over five months were off by 50 percent. That doesn’t necessarily mean players were being over- or under-comped by 50 percent, but the accuracy of the player rating ––that all important metric upon which all reinvestment strategies are based – was off by that much. And that is significant.


CI: Does tableViz work with existing CMS


products or is it entirely standalone, independent analysis? Can it recognise if a player has come across from slots, for example? Jeff: VizExplorer’s key strength is that we


interface with all casino back-end systems. That very question is what prompted Justin to look to our technology. From our standpoint, the VizExplorer platform is data agnostic. We can interface with any data source and have probably encountered them all in our installations at more than 600 casino


properties throughout the world. So yes, this means we are able to take both the table tracking data that a system like ChipVue provides, as well as any play associated with slots, and in the CMS we can give a complete, accurate view of what that customer looks like. Before, you could see a player walk over to a


table, but from a marketer’s standpoint they really don’t know much. With ChipVue, we can identify what games they play and whether they are more attractive from a hold percentage standpoint. We can see every single one of their bets, and look at side bet participation. Most tables will have a side bet, and on a poker derivative you might have three or four. They have different odds or a higher house advantage, and we can now see specifically how those games are performing and what players are betting on them. We can see they might like to play a Wheel of Fortune slot, then a bit of Three-Card Poker. Blackjack, then video poker. There are a lot of insights we can garner from this information and having access to the CMS is critical. The ability to capture side bet participation


not only gives operators the ability to provide accurate player ratings for the first time ever, but when it is paired with hand speed, it gives them an unparalleled understanding of the performance of their tables, dealers and the impact that side bets and occupancy can have on the ultimate profitability of the different table games they have on their floor. Marketers have long ignored table game players as available information was often either inconsistent, or subjective in nature. Additionally, comp decisions were usually made on a limited set of data, as hosts or table


managers had a limited view into the real performance of table players. All of this information will be accessible via tableViz with the accurate data provided by ChipVue powered by ARB LABS.


CI: Does this setup use the player’s card for


recognition or is it done another way? Jeff: Yes, the ChipVue setup includes a card


reader and a display embedded into the table. When players sit down, they hand their card to the dealer who can immediately swipe it to check the person into a playing position, viewable on the display. Currently, the player card is set to one side, and several hands could be dealt before the supervisor has the chance to actually check that player in. It’s quite inefficient. But because with our system the player is checked in immediately, that gives us great accuracy from the start. When the customer leaves, the dealer checks


the person out of that position, notifies the floor supervisor, who then modifies how much cash was put in or if they walked with chips, then the rating is closed. The closed rating goes into the CMS and that’s how we get that accurate view of what that player played.


CI: What other benefits would operators be


interested in? Jeff: With reliable data about everything happening at the tables, operators are going to benefit from a much broader picture of overall performance of the game, the player and even of the dealer. With details on every hand dealt, actual game speed, and side bet participation, operators can now properly evaluate their dealers and even understand what games they’re best at dealing, and which dealers are most effectively encouraging side bet participation. Operators will find that a world of possibility opens up with access to slot-like analytics about table games, and with it comes the chance to optimise the table game area and its associated revenue on the gaming floor.


OCTOBER 2017 51


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78