search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UK LEGAL


What’s next for financial risk assessments?


Northridge Law’s Melanie Ellis turns – once again – to the deeper implications of the 2023 Gambling Act White Paper.


F


ollowing the (previous) Government’s Gambling Act White Paper in April 2023, the Gambling Commission designed two types of financial assessments for remote gambling customers hitting financial triggers: financial vulnerability checks (to identify financially vulnerable customers) and financial risk assessments (to address binge gambling and significant unaffordable gambling losses over time), both to be implemented through the LCCP.


So far, these proposals apply only to the remote sector, but in the White Paper the Government indicated that in due course it wanted to “explore the use of frictionless


22 JUNE 2026


financial risk checks where appropriate in land-based settings to benefit operators and help protect customers”.


While the Gambling Commission’s “light touch” financial vulnerability checks have been in place since August 2024, the financial risk assessments (“FRAs”) have been subject to a long pilot phase and, following a Commission board meeting on 22 May, their future remains uncertain. Perhaps influenced by a warning from the Betting and Gaming Council that implementing FRAs now would be “disproportionate and open to legal challenge”, the Commission decided to postpone a formal decision on the


introduction of FRAs to allow further time to assess the trial data.


WHAT WOULD FINANCIAL RISK ASSESSMENTS INVOLVE? The trigger thresholds for FRAs, should they come into effect, has yet to be confirmed, but the original proposal was for a check when customers incurred net losses of £1,000 in a 24-hour period or £2,000 in a 90 day period (halved for under 25s). The operator would need to review a financial risk assessment provided by a credit reference agency which would take into account the information held by that


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84