search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UK LEGAL


stated intention of using taxes to disincentivise uptake of more harmful products is not born out by the tax rates being applied.


IMPLICATIONS


Significant tax increases mean that businesses must cut costs elsewhere. Options likely being considered include adjusting odds and RTP, cutting the marketing budget including reducing bonus offers, reducing headcount and/or moving more of the business offshore.


Cuts to odds, RTP rates, bonus offers and marketing budgets will, unfortunately, directly impact the ability of licensed operators to compete with those illegally targeting the British market without paying any tax. The Gambling Commission’s recent research identified searching for the best odds, RTP percentages and bonus offers as one of the key drivers behind use of unlicensed operators, relevant to three of its four identified audiences.


Unlicensed operators do not, of course, need to follow the Gambling Commission’s LCCP and guidance documents or advertising codes. Customers tempted to such operators by better odds and offers will often find they are unable to set themselves limits on their gambling or self-exclude and sometimes experience difficulties withdrawing their winnings.


Whether increasing tax rates for activities perceived as “more harmful” actually leads to lower rates of harm is highly questionable.


TACKLING THE BLACK MARKET The Government has promised £26m in additional funding for the Gambling Commission to tackle illegal operators, spread over the next three years. Whilst this funding will no doubt be welcomed, it is difficult to see how it will have any significant impact on the regulator’s ability to block access to illegal providers. The Commission already issues a large number of cease and desist letters, but these are unlikely to have any impact on those who clearly already know they are operating unlawfully. It has also removed many URLs from search results, but operators easily create new URLs and redirect customers, so again it’s unclear whether this action serves to reduce the use of unlicensed operators.


Given that the Commission’s research has so far failed to accurately estimate the size of the illegal market, it will be nigh on impossible to determine whether this increased funding for disruption activities has any impact.


FREEPLAYS AND BONUSES The original consultation sought views on the treatment of freeplays and free bets, proposing to align the treatment of prizes


under remote gaming duty, general betting duty and pool betting duty, so that only prizes won as a result of a successful outcome of single game or bet could be deducted from the duty calculation as winnings. Rather than making changes to the existing system, the Government has chosen to “monitor developments”, but HMRC will review and update its guidance to “ensure it is clear and supports effective compliance”.


PREMISES BASED OPERATORS


The Government’s decision to maintain existing duty rates for premises-based operators (and remove the duty for bingo halls) reflects a deliberate policy choice to protect this section of the industry. In particular, no increased duty rates for gaming machines will come as a relief.


Melanie has been providing UK legal and regulatory advice to betting and gaming clients since the advent of the Gambling Act 2005. She advises on all aspects of gambling law including licence applications, compliance, advertising, licence reviews and changes of control and is described in the legal directories as “a very impressive lawyer” who “demonstrates commercial pragmatism supported with a great deal of technical and operational knowledge and experience”.


Melanie has acted for a wide range of gambling operators including major online and land-based bookmakers and casinos, B2B game and software suppliers and start-ups. She also frequently advises operators of raffles, prize competitions, free draws and social gaming products. Melanie has a particular interest in the use of new technology for gambling products and


novel product ideas. She is a regular contributor to industry publications and often speaks at industry events. Melanie is listed as a ‘Leading Partner’ in the Legal 500 guide and is also ranked in Chambers.


DECEMBER 2025 25


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104