search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
LUXURY AND GIFT PACKAGING


had to secure a fragile chocolate product during transit. The outer box was designed around the presentation pack, eliminating the need for void fill. Rather than treating


presentation,


protection and shipping as separate problems, the project considered them together. This is particularly relevant to manufacturers selling seasonal collections, personalised gifts and limited-edition products online, where the packaging must arrive in good condition and provide a positive first impression on delivery. As Verity Mottram, Creative Design Lead


at Antalis Premium Packaging, explained in the company’s May announcement: “Good packaging protects the product, but great packaging enhances the customer experience and reinforces the brand.”


Bringing luxury finishes to production scale For confectionery manufacturers, a packaging concept must ultimately work beyond the design studio. Gift ranges can include multiple box formats, product assortments and seasonal variations, placing pressure on changeover times, consistency and production costs. CPack’s January 2026 announcement


of its Giftwrap 3000 Flexiwrap addresses one part of this challenge. The system is designed to wrap chocolate boxes in paper, combining an appearance associated with hand finishing with automated production. According to CPack, it can accommodate different box sizes without manual changeover of parts and includes automatic alignment and variable-speed control. The development highlights an important


distinction between luxury packaging as a visual concept and luxury packaging as a repeatable manufacturing process. A finish that works on a small prototype may be difficult or expensive to reproduce consistently across a large run. Automation can help manufacturers maintain presentation standards, although its suitability depends on the product mix, volumes and required degree of customisation. There is also a commercial balance


to strike between standardisation and differentiation. Shared packaging structures with variations in artwork, colour or finishes may allow brands to create distinct seasonal collections without


introducing an entirely


new format for every product. For manufacturers managing broad portfolios, this can help control tooling, inventory and production complexity while preserving a recognisable identity.


A premium experience with a clear purpose Luxury and gift packaging sits at the


Godiva reviews e-commerce packaging with Lil Packaging


As online sales become an established channel for premium confectionery, packaging suppliers face the challenge of protecting fragile products while controlling material use and packing costs. Godiva’s work with UK supplier Lil Packaging provides an example of how changes to shipping formats can address these requirements. According to Lil Packaging’s case


study, published in July 2026, Godiva initially used six different box sizes for its e-commerce orders. The packaging often left unused space around the products, requiring additional void fill to limit movement during transit. This increased material consumption and added steps to the packing process. Lil Packaging recommended its


Mailboxes and Bookwraps to improve the fit between packaging and product. Godiva subsequently adopted a bespoke printed Breezebox incorporating Breezepaper, an integrated paper-based system designed to hold products


securely in place without separate loose void fill. The revised format was developed


around Godiva’s requirements for online fulfilment, combining product protection with branded external packaging. Lil Packaging reports that the approach reduced the amount of packaging material required and simplified stock management, while helping to improve packing and dispatch efficiency. The company has not published quantified savings for the project. The case highlights several considerations for


confectionery


manufacturers selling directly to consumers. Assorted can vary in


chocolates size and shape, and


movement during delivery can damage individual pieces or compromise their presentation. Packaging that is too large may require additional protective material, while a broad range of box sizes can increase storage requirements and complicate stock control.


intersection of brand communication, engineering and consumer experience. Its success depends on more than a striking design: the pack must protect the confectionery, function reliably in production and distribution, and meet the expectations attached to its price point. Recent developments suggest that these


objectives need not be mutually exclusive. Cartonboard designs are finding ways to replace plastic components; paper-based


wraps are being developed with product protection in mind; and packaging suppliers are combining presentation with more considered material use and fulfilment. Nevertheless, no single material or


format offers a universal answer. Brands must evaluate the complete packaging system, including product shelf life, manufacturing efficiency, transport, customer experience and the reality of local recycling infrastructure.


OCTOBER 2026 • KENNEDY’S CONFECTION • 53


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60