search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BATCH VS CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION


production switches. The right calculation considers the full order economics, rather than unit cost alone.


Responding to a more varied product mix The pressure to accommodate more product


variants is also influencing


equipment development. In its April 2026 announcement ahead of interpack, TNA Solutions identified increasing SKU complexity, labour shortages and rising operating costs as issues facing confectionery manufacturers. Its latest planned mogul enhancements focus on faster changeovers, improved process control and reduced waste, with the company reporting output of more than 3,000kg per hour. The announcement


illustrates how


flexibility and high throughput are not necessarily competing objectives. TNA’s developments include in-line tray weighing before and after depositing, allowing the pump stroke to adjust dynamically during production. The aim is to maintain weight consistency, reduce product giveaway and identify out-of- specification trays earlier in the process. The company also outlined changes


intended to make changeovers faster and safer, including clean-in-place hoppers and remote-controlled hopper compartment valves. Its wider focus is on reducing manual intervention and improving equipment availability in high- mix production environments. These developments matter because a


shorter run is only commercially attractive if the time and resources required to switch products do not consume the benefits. A line that can manufacture several variants but loses substantial production time between them may struggle to deliver the flexibility customers need at an acceptable cost. Chocolate processing provides another


example of the way equipment design can support a wider range of production requirements.


In May 2026, Bühler


presented its CompactMix system as a modular solution for chocolate masses used in spreads, fillings and coatings. The system combines mixing and grinding technologies, handles recipes from low-fat to high-fat applications and offers scalable capacity from 400kg/h to 3,000kg/h. Bühler says product changeovers can be completed with cleaning times of less than two hours, with minimal waste.


The capacity range is significant because


it gives manufacturers options between small-scale development and industrial production. It does not remove the need to plan recipes, schedule production or validate the finished product, but it demonstrates how modular systems can serve different volumes without requiring every application to follow the same production model.


The cost of changing products The benefits of shorter runs must be considered alongside the operational demands they create. Every change in recipe, format or packaging can introduce additional work, whether that involves cleaning equipment, adjusting settings, replacing components, checking product


quality or preparing new


packaging materials. Carol recognises the additional


complexity that comes with frequent changes. “Switching frequently between different products, combined with shorter production runs, adds complexity around scheduling, changeovers and waste, so careful planning is essential. “We focus on managing those changeovers efficiently,


46 • KENNEDY’S CONFECTION • OCTOBER 2026


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60