BATCH VS CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION
tailored to specific occasions or customer groups. Smaller brands and private-label customers may need modest quantities, while established businesses can face unexpected demand or a requirement to test a new concept before committing to a large production run. For manufacturers, the challenge is to
choose between batch and continuous production and also to understand which model best suits the product, the order and the customer — and whether the production system can accommodate variation without making it prohibitively expensive. Carol Oldbury, CEO of Hames Chocolates,
sees flexibility as a central advantage of a made-to-order approach. “Our made- to-order model gives us the flexibility to develop bespoke products to individual briefs, from the recipe and flavour through to format, packaging and price point. “It also means we can support shorter runs and respond quickly to unexpected customer requests, making the model well suited to seasonal ranges, limited editions and new concepts. For customers, this gives greater freedom to test ideas and manage volumes without committing to unnecessarily large runs.” Her comments point to a distinction
that is sometimes lost in discussions about production efficiency: the most efficient manufacturing model is not necessarily the one that produces the largest volume in the shortest time. It is the one that can deliver the required product, in the required quantity and to the required standard, at a commercially sustainable cost.
Scale versus flexibility Continuous production is designed to keep product moving through a process with minimal interruption. It is particularly effective for established products with predictable demand, where long runs can justify the investment in dedicated equipment and the costs associated with setting up a line. For standardised confectionery, including high-volume sweets and other products made to consistent specifications, the ability to maintain throughput can be a significant advantage. Equipment, labour and process settings can be optimised around a known product, while longer runs reduce the frequency of changeovers and the associated cleaning, adjustment and downtime.
A batch-based operation can still
[TNA’S] LATEST PLANNED MOGUL ENHANCEMENTS FOCUS ON FASTER
CHANGEOVERS, IMPROVED PROCESS CONTROL AND REDUCED WASTE, WITH THE COMPANY REPORTING OUTPUT OF MORE THAN 3,000KG PER HOUR
manufacture at substantial scale, while continuous lines can be designed to handle more than one product. Nor does made-to- order necessarily mean every product is developed from scratch. Its value lies in the ability to tailor production to a customer’s requirements and order volumes. Carol explains
the commercial trade-off Batch production offers a different
set of advantages. Products can be manufactured in defined quantities, with recipes, ingredients and processing conditions adjusted between runs. Depending on the equipment and process, this can make it easier to accommodate different formulations, flavours, colours and product formats without dedicating an entire line to each variant. Made-to-order production builds on this
flexibility by aligning manufacture more closely with a specific customer brief or order. The approach can be particularly useful where the finished product requires bespoke branding, a particular pack format or a recipe developed for a retailer, seasonal range or limited-edition launch.
directly: “The main trade-off is between the efficiencies of producing at scale and the flexibility to tailor products more closely to customer needs. “Continuous production works best where demand is high and predictable. A made-to-order model gives customers more control over specification, volume and timing, helping them order more appropriate quantities, respond quickly to new opportunities and reduce the risk of excess stock. For many customers, that flexibility can deliver better overall value.” A large production run may lower the
cost per unit, but that advantage can be eroded if demand is overestimated, products remain unsold or a retailer has to hold more stock than its sales justify. Seasonal confectionery is a clear example: products may have a narrow selling window, and the consequences of overproduction can be more pronounced once the occasion has passed. Smaller runs can help limit that
exposure, although they do not automatically guarantee lower overall costs. Manufacturers still need to account for set-up time, labour, material purchasing, cleaning, packaging changes and the impact of more frequent
OCTOBER 2026 • KENNEDY’S CONFECTION • 45
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60
