BATCH VS CONTINUOUS PRODUCTION


proposition, but it cannot be separated from the fundamentals of manufacturing performance. “Production flexibility is becoming increasingly important in confectionery as retailers look for more innovation, greater differentiation and products tailored to different shoppers, occasions and price points,” Carol says. “But this still needs to sit alongside


the basics: consistent quality, food safety, reliable service and competitive pricing. The strongest manufacturers will be those that can offer bespoke ranges and smaller or more tailored order quantities while still delivering the best overall value, without compromising on quality, consistency or efficiency.” That balance is also reflected in the


investments being made by equipment suppliers. TNA’s focus on weight control and changeover performance, Bühler’s modular chocolate processing and moulding systems, and WDS’s monitoring technology all address different parts of the same challenge: reducing the operational penalty associated with variation. No single machine or


production


sell. Instead, the priority may be to launch at an appropriate scale, assess demand and retain the option to develop the range further.


Flexibility must still deliver value For


manufacturers, flexibility is increasingly part of the customer


model can resolve every constraint. Manufacturers need to consider the entire process, from recipe development and raw material handling through to depositing, cooling, decoration, packaging and dispatch. A flexible processing line may have limited value if the packaging stage cannot accommodate the same range of formats, or if the planning system cannot


schedule smaller orders effectively. Equally, high-volume production


remains central to meeting demand for established products at competitive prices. Continuous production can provide the repeatability and throughput needed for large, predictable orders, and it would be a mistake to regard it as a model that is becoming obsolete simply because product portfolios are expanding. The more practical approach is to assess


the requirements of each product and customer. Standardised products with reliable demand may justify long continuous runs. Seasonal products, private-label variants and bespoke recipes may benefit


from


batch or made-to-order production. Some manufacturers will use both approaches across different product families, or combine them within a wider production strategy.


Two models, one manufacturing strategy The outlook, according to Carol, is not a contest in which one production method will replace the other. “I think there will continue to be a role for both models. Continuous production will remain the best fit for simple, standardised products where demand is high and predictable. “At the same time, made-to-order


manufacturing is likely to become more important as customers look for greater differentiation, faster innovation and more control over order quantities. Rather than one replacing the other, manufacturers will need to use the approach that best suits each product and customer requirement.” That is a pragmatic conclusion for an industry balancing established volume lines with a growing range of customer expectations. The commercial objective is not to maximise flexibility regardless of cost, nor to pursue scale at the expense of responsiveness. It is to determine where each approach delivers the strongest result. For manufacturers,


that means


understanding demand, calculating the true cost of changeovers and assessing where equipment investment can improve adaptability. For brand owners and retailers, it means recognising the relationship between order size, lead time, specification and price. And for both,


it means treating production


strategy as a commercial decision rather than a fixed commitment to one manufacturing model.


OCTOBER 2026 • KENNEDY’S CONFECTION • 49


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60