search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Column: JESD204 standard


Figure 3: Two interleaved ADCs – Nyquist zone


frequency component to the mismatch. With the offset mismatch, no signal is


needed to see the inherent DC offset of the two ADCs; however, to observe the gain mismatch, the ADCs need a signal. Gain mismatch results in a spur in the output spectrum that is related to the input frequency and the sampling rate and will appear at fS


/2 ± fIN . To minimise this spur,


a similar strategy is used as with the offset mismatch – the gain of one of the ADCs is chosen as a reference, and the gain of the other is set to match its gain value as closely as possible. Te better these gain values are matched, the smaller the resulting spur.


samples acquired, this DC offset changes; see Figure 4. Te output switches between these offset values at a rate of fS


/2, which


results in a spur in the output spectrum located at fS


/2. Since the mismatch itself


does not have a frequency component and is only at DC, the frequency of the spur that appears in the output spectrum only depends on the sampling frequency and will always appear at the frequency of fS


/2.


Te magnitude of the spur is dependent upon the magnitude of the offset mismatch between the ADCs – the greater the mismatch, the larger the spur. To minimise this spur caused by


the offset mismatch, there’s no need to completely null the DC offset in each ADC, since this would filter out any DC content in the signal, and would not work for systems using zero IF (ZIF) architecture, where the signal content is real and complex and includes data at DC. A more appropriate technique is to match the offset of one of the ADCs to the other. Choose one of the offsets as a reference, and match the offset of the other as closely as possible. Te better the match, the lower the resulting spur at fS


/2.


Gain mistmatch Figure 5 shows gain mismatch between two interleaved converters. Here there’s a


There are certain challenges when


interleaving ADCs, mostly in the form of spurs


Timing mismatch Te timing mismatch between two ADCs has two components: group delay in the analogue section of the ADC, and clock skew; see Figure 6. Te analogue circuitry within the ADC has an associated group delay, with a different value between the two. In addition, the clock skew has an aperture uncertainty component in each ADC and has a component related to the accuracy of the clock phases input to each converter. Similar to the gain mismatch spur, the


timing mismatch spur is also a function of the input frequency and the sample rate, and appears at fS


/2 ± fIN . To minimise the spur, the group delay


Figure 4: Offset mismatch


Figure 5: Gain mismatch www.electronicsworld.co.uk September 2021 17


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50