Internet Of Things
How to choose the best IoT gateway
By Adilson Jacob, applications & development engineer, Anders Electronics T
he IPv6 address space is large enough for us to cover the entire planet with connected electronic devices, many times over. With the total number of installed
Internet of Things (IoT) devices now reckoned to be more than 35 billion, and predicted to reach 75 billion by 2025, we are certainly doing our best.
Moreover, there is an incredible diversity of applications, across contexts like smart cities, smart factories, smart agriculture, smart living, smart driving – not to mention smart grids and smart transportation. The existence of connectivity standards has been crucial in letting the IoT become real and workable. However, when it comes to implementing the connections, we find that a generic IoT gateway rarely meets a specific application requirement. A certain amount of tailoring or customisation is often needed. You could search exhaustively for an off- the-shelf unit that meets your exact needs. Or you could choose a gateway that is a “best fit” with your application, maybe leaving some connections unused or working around a missing feature. If you have a large budget and plenty of time, you might consider having a design brought up from scratch to meet your exact requirements. Fortunately, some gateways let you configure and customise the basic specification to meet special needs. Some examples include the
IOT-GATE-i.MX8 and IOT-GATE-APL from CompuLab. However, even when using these, a little extra engineering expertise can help you get closer to an ideal solution. Let’s take a closer look.
How can I customise the IOT-
GATE-i.MX8 to meet my needs? The CompuLab
IOT-GATE-i.MX8 industrial IoT gateway comes well appointed, with an LTE modem, Wi-Fi 6, Bluetooth 5.1, and multiple LAN, USB, and serial data ports. You can further extend the connectivity by choosing from a range of off-the-shelf I/O add-on boards from CompuLab. These include
32 March 2022
CAN-FD, RS485/ RS232, TMP2, 4-channel digital input/output, and GPIO cards. This flexibility lets users tailor the
IOT-GATE-i.MX8 to suit a wide variety of industrial contexts and applications.
Knowing this, it’s possible to create custom cards for various functions such as connecting a display, adding a USB 2.0 interface, or taking advantage of the host processor’s general-purpose I/O (GPIO), I2C, and UART connections.
One limitation is that the desired extension board comes pre-fitted by CompuLab and must be specified when ordering. It is not possible to order and fit any of these boards retrospectively. However, CompuLab provides information about the expansion connectors that makes it possible for us to create custom boards if needed to fulfil specific requirements. The supporting literature for the IOT-GATE-i. MX8 reveals that the expansion connector contains signals from multifunctional pins of the unit’s main
i.MX8M Mini processor.
Components in Electronics
How can IOT-GATE-APL Fitlet2 gateway devices be expanded? If you are working with a gateway such as the IOT-GATE-APL (aka Fitlet2), you can take advantage of CompuLab’s extensive range of FACET (Function and Connectivity Extension T-Card) add-on cards. You can choose from cards to add extra Gigabit Ethernet ports or USB ports, connect a SATA solid-state disk (SSD) or wireless modules such as Wi-Fi or Bluetooth, or introduce support for things like Power over Ethernet (PoE) or a cellular modem for 3G or 4G-LTE.
The FACET boards allow a great deal of flexibility, and they can be added easily. Indeed, the Fitlet2 is designed to be easy to take apart to add these extension cards as well as customise the RAM and storage. CompuLab has described Fitlet2 as a 3D metal jigsaw with interlocking parts. You can go it alone with Fitlet2 and expect to succeed in most cases. Sometimes,
however, extra support and specialist technical knowhow is needed. We recently helped a customer working on a bespoke Fitlet2 gateway, which had been extended using a FACET card to add a handful of extra USB ports. The unit had failed EMC testing. It’s an inconvenient discovery at any time, but this was late in the project. A fast solution was needed, with minimal impact on the underlying design.
We were able to modify the FACET extension card, introducing EMC mitigation
www.cieonline.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54
