search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FEATURE TEST & COMPLIANCE


BETTER TO BE SAFE THAN SORRY Traceability and regulatory expectations


Words by Claire Gittens, business line manager, consumer product service, TÜV SÜD T


he objective of the European Commission’s New Legislative Framework (NLF) is to strengthen the effectiveness of product safety legislation, ensuring a greater consistency across industries and requiring important administrative and regulatory changes. Within the supply chain, this has extended to those who are responsible for ensuring the safety and appropriability of goods. In particular, the NLF changed the rules for fulfilment houses which previously had no clearly defined responsibility: they are now considered a ‘distributor’ and must abide by those rules. The NLF aims to improve market surveillance, to better protect both consumers and professionals from unsafe products. This includes giving manufacturers, importers and distributors transparent obligations, extending their scope of responsibility. The EC’s Blue Guide on the implementation of EU product rules is a useful reference to understand all of the directives, regulations and decisions that fall under the NLF. The NLF aims to deliver improved


traceability of consumer products throughout the supply chain, refining the proficiency of recalls and withdrawals to help market surveillance authorities determine if a product is certifiable. Manufacturers and importers must therefore ensure that products bear their name/trademark and address. Online channels have brought their own challenges, as the global internet marketplace often utilises fulfilment houses to store and post the product locally, but at no time do these freight forwarders own the product. This means that when the goods are bought from outside of the EU, there is no clear party accountable for marketing the goods. The problem is that many such products have no code, no brand name and are often unsafe. Under the NLF, fulfilment houses would now be considered to be a distributor and, therefore, must take responsibility for what they store and ship for third-parties, ensuring compliance.


22 SEPTEMBER 2019 | ELECTRONICS As such, fulfilment houses must verify


that the product bears the required conformity marking - i.e. CE marking - and it is accompanied by the relevant documents, instructions and safety information, all of which must be in a suitable language for the end user. Products that fall under a CE marking Directive cannot be imported into the EU unless they show that mark. Customs officials keep watch for the CE marking on products entering ports, and those businesses importing into the EU are required to hold test reports and certificates that prove compliance. If such information is missing, this may result in their prosecution, as they have a legal responsibility for holding proof. There is a widespread assumption


that CE marking stamped on a product is proof of its safety. Companies run the risk of falling foul of this misunderstanding. CE marking is simply a manufacturer’s self-declaration that the product complies with the relevant European legislation. In practice, this means that it must comply with the essential requirements of the relevant EU directives. Less scrupulous manufacturers may not bother to test products and may simply affix the CE marking and sign the Declaration of Conformity (DoC). Due to language issues, other manufacturers who mean well


are misunderstanding the requirements of a complex set of directives - giving products that should fail tests a CE marking. This of course means that there is an increasing problem in the supply chain with counterfeit goods. Not only does this have major implications for the safety of end-users, but also for reputable brand owners and manufacturers who, while they take product safety and compliance seriously, may be caught out by a failure within their supply chain.


Claire Gittens, business line manager, consumer product service, TÜV SÜD


Under the NLF, the distributor is also responsible for ensuring that both the manufacturer and importer have met their traceability obligations by including their name and address, as well as a product identification number. In other words, the fulfilment house must be able to identify who has supplied the product to them, and demonstrate that the relevant steps have been taken to ensure that the product is compliant, fully traceable and that due care has been taken when storing and transporting the product. It is therefore vital


that every business fully understands its role in the supply chain and what its legal requirements are. For example, if a retailer has ‘own brand’ products,


they are considered to be a manufacturer and must


therefore comply against those requirements. It is the responsibility


of every player in the supply chain to ensure that they have the correct documentation and, if in doubt, seek advice from an expert such as Trading Standards.


TÜV SÜD www.tuvsud.com / ELECTRONICS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44