DS-SEP23-PG28+29_Layout 1 15/09/2023 10:52 Page 1
FEATURE CAD/SOFTWARE
Still seen primarily as a prototyping
technology, additive manufacturing (AM) is getting a boost
from AI and machine
learning software that can help with AM decision making
3
D printing has been with us for more than 40 years, yet additive manufacturing (AM), which can deliver enormous value, is still greatly
underutilised. When properly implemented, it can reduce material waste and energy costs, improve part reliability, decrease lead times, reduce or eliminate the need to carry inventory, and optimise the production of legacy parts. However, transitioning to AM requires a change
in mindset plus the ability to quickly and easily identify which parts are best suited to the process. This is where AI and machine learning are now bridging the gap between traditional AM – where most of its value materialises in the form of functional prototypes – and more advanced additive manufacturing operations.
Unlocking the valUe of aM
with software scanning parts
The software’s algorithm and machine learning can scan thousands of parts at once by analysing CAD files. It evaluates five factors: materials, CAD geometry, costs, lead time and strength testing, to identify suitable parts for AM. The software can also make Design for Additive Manufacturing (DfAM) suggestions regarding part consolidation and weight reduction opportunities. “The software delivers a lot of detail. For
instance, it will tell you whether your costs can be reduced with an improved design or by selecting a different material,” explained Omer
Blaier, co-founder of Castor. “So, let’s say a manufacturer determines that a lower-cost material is more important than the strength. The platform would then recommend a material better suited for your design.” For Danfoss, there has always been a desire
to increase its AM processes, both for DfAM on its new products, as well as its existing product lines and legacy parts. “There are a lot of big companies out
there trying to get engineers to think about additive manufacturing when designing a new component,” added Blaier. “We come at it from the other side, trying to find opportunities within your current designs.”
aM for the Military
Few organisations, if any, have a larger library of part designs than the U.S. military, which is increasingly looking to AM as a potential solution to a number of challenges. For example, both the Air Force and Navy are in the process of creating an end-to-end digital manufacturing solution that slashes cycle times from weeks to hours, thus greatly decreasing project costs. “We are talking about millions, or even billions,
of parts in its arsenal. There was just no way the U.S. military could go through each one of those manually and figure out which components could
Companies that are looking to automate the
process of identifying which parts should be moved to additive manufacturing are increasingly relying on new industrial 3D printing software that can quickly determine AM feasibility. As an example, Danfoss, a leader in drives, HVAC and power management systems, utilises a platform that helps manufacturers unlock the benefits of industrial 3D printing by providing a technical and cost-saving analysis. The Castor3D software allows the company to focus on its end components and more specifically the costs associated with that. Commenting on this, Werner Stapela, head of
global additive design and manufacturing at Danfoss, said: “We have upwards of a million part numbers. It would be impossible for us to manually analyse each one to determine whether additive manufacturing would either add value or reduce costs.”
2 DESIGN SOLUTIONS SEPTEMBER 2023 8
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90 |
Page 91 |
Page 92 |
Page 93 |
Page 94 |
Page 95 |
Page 96 |
Page 97 |
Page 98 |
Page 99 |
Page 100 |
Page 101 |
Page 102 |
Page 103 |
Page 104 |
Page 105 |
Page 106 |
Page 107 |
Page 108 |
Page 109 |
Page 110 |
Page 111 |
Page 112 |
Page 113 |
Page 114 |
Page 115 |
Page 116 |
Page 117 |
Page 118 |
Page 119 |
Page 120 |
Page 121 |
Page 122 |
Page 123 |
Page 124 |
Page 125 |
Page 126