BSEE
n 14 June 2017, in the capital city of modern,
that industry leads the way, with the first tranche of consultations due this spring.
Tougher sanctions, safer buildings
ECA and the FSA welcome the government’s
By Tom Brookes, managing director of Lindum Fire Services and chair of the FSA
announcement that the new regulatory system will aim to introduce stronger sanctions and enforcement powers. This would go a long way towards preventing and punishing wrongdoing and help to set the standard for all.
recommendations made in Dame Hackitt’s review, to which ECA and the Fire and Security Association (FSA) made a number of influential recommendations.
Whilst lacking detail about how exactly a new regulatory system would work, Housing Secretary James Brokenshire has said that the current system is “not fit for purpose” and that “a radical systemic
overhaul” is required. Whilst also admitting this will take time, government is keen
The expertise of the Health and Safety Executive, Local Authority Building Control, the Fire and Rescue Service, plus others will be drawn together to form a new ‘Joint Regulator Group’ to pilot new approaches to sanctioning, in advance of any new legislation. A regulatory ‘gateway’ concept will be trialled, drawing parallels with practice in other industries. In practice, this means that at every stage of a building’s life, duty holders will need to collect, hold, analyse and make available data on fire safety, creating what’s been described as a digital ‘Golden Thread’.
apparently safety- conscious, Britain, a structural fire claimed 72 lives at Grenfell Tower. It was the worst UK residential fire since the Second World War. In the months following the fire, former chair of the Health and Safety Executive, Dame Judith Hackitt, was tasked with drafting the Independent Review of Building Regulations and Fire Safety to address the flaws in the system, which allowed the disaster to happen. In December 2018, the government published its plan to deliver the
INDUSTRY COMMENT: ECA
After Grenfell, is fundamental safety reform finally on the way? O
ECA and the FSA will be actively helping to guide the electrotechnical industry through the range of technical solutions available, to help achieve this ‘digital by default’ approach.
Setting the bar
A primary goal of the Hackitt review and the government’s
implementation plan is to develop a joined-up competency framework for professionals in all industries involved in a building’s lifecycle – design,
construction, maintenance and fire, to name a few. Fortunately, the electrotechnical and fire/security sectors already benefit from having set up one, well-established competence benchmark, widely known as the Electrotechnical Standard and the Fire, Emergency and Security Standard (FESS), respectively. In other words, for each sector, there is only one bar to clear, but it is sufficiently high to show the competence of those who pass it. The standard can be achieved either by completing a full-term
apprenticeship or through recognised accredited prior learning. However, both routes involve a rigorous and comprehensive level of written and practical assessments.
Over the next few months, government intends to take a view on how to deliver such a system for the wider construction sector. The system is expected to mandate the use of sufficiently qualified
professionals who can demonstrate that their skills are up to date.
The road to safer buildings may be a long one, but we need to get on with it, and fast. Government, industry and trade bodies such as ECA and the FSA are making significant steps in the right direction, to help ensure that a tragedy like Grenfell never happens again.
www.eca.co.uk
30 BUILDING SERVICES & ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEER JUNE 2019
Read the latest at:
www.bsee.co.uk
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50
