search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Feature


ClockWise? D


Are there “not enough hours in the day” or are we missing something in the L&D strategy?Rebecca McDowallon why time shouldnt define learning capacity


oes the following sound familiar: “Why has X not made time for their training? Clearly they’re not committed”?


ime is often the first thing we reach for when trying to understand learning behaviour. The assumption is: if people have the time, they’ll complete it. If they haven’t, maybe they aren’t that engaged. The conversation around learners having or making the time is ever-present. But this line of thinking misses something. When we use time availability as a proxy


for someone’s ability or motivation to learn, we overlook a much more complex reality. One shaped not only by calendars, but by mental, emotional, and cognitive capacity. When we ignore these invisible factors, we risk judging people unfairly, designing ineffective solutions, and reinforcing workplace inequalities. But it’s not just about time, it’s about headspace. Many employees aren’t skipping training because they’re lazy or uninterested. They’re skipping it because they’re tired. Or stressed. Or cognitively stretched from back-to-back meetings, constant context switching,


or the weight of personal challenges. And while a training module may “only”


take 30 minutes, the mental space required to engage meaningfully is often far greater. he rain needs room to process, reflect, and absorb new information. And that room isn’t always available, even if the clock says it is. We need to recognise that time on the calendar isn’t the same as capacity in the mind. Workload pressures, high-performance cultures, and ‘always-on’ communication environments can leave people cognitively and emotionally depleted. In these conditions, learning becomes just another task to survive, not an opportunity to grow. >


Learning Magazine | 9


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84