search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE SO WHAT? WITH JOE SCHUMAKER FCSI


the mic drop definition F


Independence:


or design consultants, it’s simple: we do not make any money from the sale of food or equipment. Mic drop. Te end.


Joe Schumaker FCSI ruminates on the true nature of objectivity for FCSI Professional members


What we must do instead is be ferocious learners. About our industry, clients, and the equipment we specify to serve those clients. To fulfil that, it’s essential we learn all we can about the equipment we’re specifying. We need to know everything about the equipment so we can help make the right selection for our clients’ needs. Some manufacturers do a good job of


earning that specification, but many have been forced – by an industry intent on nickel and diming itself – to try and buy that specification from more unscrupulous designer/dealers instead. Our job as independent consultants is to


deflect those influences as best we can. It’s about holding the line. Ensuring we remain impartial when it comes to equipment specification. Te problem is, sometimes it can be hard to understand where that line is. Is it OK for a manufacturer to fly a


JOE SCHUMAKER FCSI Based in Idaho, Joe Schumaker FCSI is the founder and CEO of FoodSpace


FURTHER DETAILS: So what do you think? Join the debate by contacting Joe:


10 joe@myfoodspace com


consultant to their facility to show us new products? Yes. Although I fully understand why some consultants prefer to pay their own way. Is it OK for them to try to pay for other trips not associated with a project or factory tour? Absolutely not. Tat’s where we must hold the line for us to be truly independent consultants. Tere is a gray area where we as consultants can get into some complicated issues. I believe there is zero reason why a manufacturer can’t pay me to design a Revit family for a new brand of equipment, because I’m transacting my services and my time, however that leads to the question: does that subconsciously make me, as a


consultant, more biased to that brand? Tere are some within FCSI who do believe there is an unconscious bias, but I believe people can make the right decision in that scenario. Why? Because a good consultant is always going to consciously make the right specification decision for their client. At FoodSpace we recently held a


Combi-Challenge Competition where we tested a range of combi-ovens under several different conditions to determine their strengths and weaknesses. We didn’t buy the ovens, they were shipped to us, temporarily. Am I now subconsciously drawn to just those brands? Te answer is no, I am not, but us being able to test those products will help us make the most unbiased specification possible in the future. As consultants, isn’t that what we’re dealing with every day, anyway? What’s the difference, if we’re seeing equipment at a trade show, a supplier’s factory, or in a test kitchen? If we’re taking


the extra effort to educate ourselves on the equipment then we’re the least biased. Our spec is the least ‘bought’. Tat’s how I define independence.


Tat does not mean that manufacturers


can’t pay us for services. Tey can still be our customer, partner, friend, and we can still be unbiased. Our client is paying us for our unbiased spec. Our expertise. Our years of experience. Being a Professional member of FCSI and adhering to the code of ethics makes us stronger as independent consultants. We must keep that integrity and turn that into a strength. Can a commission-based dealer designer specify from that same place of integrity? Tey cannot. Mic drop. Te end.


FOR MORE GO TO FCSI.ORG


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68