search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
26 Clitheroe Advertiser &Times, Thursday, May 12th, 2005


www.cHtheroetoday.co.uk


' Cllt’herM 422324 (Editorial), 422323 (Advertising), Burnley 422331 (Classified)


Clitheroe 422324 (Editorial), 422323 (Advertising), Burnley 422331 (Classified)


www.clitheroetoday.co.uk


Clitheroe Advertiser & Times, Thursday, May 12th, 2005 27 Letters to the Editor ] Write to: The Editor. Clillicrou Advertiser .md Tinic.s, 3 King Street, ClUlieruc BB72EW Ediiorial e-mail: vivicn.mca(h@castlancsnews.co.idr}— Walking is a non-starter for many people


I AM writing in response to the letter sent in last week by Amanda Waddington which suggested that people walk to Roe- field to use the facilities rather than "waste time complaining". May I point out that as a regular gym


user living in Riraington, I would have a round trip walk of approximately 14 miles. Using the gym three to four times a


week would make this impossible, so a fee of 70p X 4 visits amounts to £2.80 per week, or an extra £145.60 on top of gym fees.


This represents a substantial increase. I also feel that Amanda has completely


missed the point with regards to the GP referral scheme. Would she expect heart attack and


stroke victims to walk to the gym? Also, what about the children/youth


activity schemes? I suggest that Amanda thinks again and


realises the impact of such ah unwise and ill thought out decision by our council.


JUDITH CUNLIFFE, Riminglon


Being local has its rewards. £99'of energy savings and discounts for Advertiser readers. How rewarding


If you live in the areas covered by the Clitheroe Advertiser & Times, you could get a great range of benefits from British Gas that could save you money, earn you discounts and cut the cost of your gas and electricity bills*.


£15 cheaper


If you currently take ■ your electricity from npower, British Gas could be £15 (5%) cheaper^


£15 dual fuel discount


If you also take gas from us, we'll give you an additional £15"' dual fuel discount each year


Protect your energy prices


Protect your energy prices from rising until April 2007^, and still benefit if they fali '


A £46 gas discount


Pay for your gas by Direct Debit'' and you could benefit from a £46** discount each year


£13 electricity discount


Pay for your electricity by Direct Debit" and you could get £13* discount each year


Save the environment


Manage your gas and electricity bills online, and you'll help save the environment and receive a £5* discount every year for each fuel you register


iust talk to your Local Sales Adviser or call 08A5 6000 561* to find out how you can start saving money and earning discounts


British Gas Doing the right thing ring, JH|[ Heating ^ Maintaining _ (Q- Protecting Connecting


•Savings and discounts expiained below (information correct at time of going to print, discounts subject to change). The local supplier may also offer similar discounts. +Based on our price for quarterly cash or cheque domestic electricity on a single rate credit meter at annual average consumption of 3,300 kWh compared to quarterly cash or cheque standard variable prices paid more than 10 days after the bill date with npower in the former Yorkshire host area as at 1st February 2005. Figures are rounded, include VAT at 5% and vary according to payment method and. consumption. tPrice protected until April 2007. Based on our standard current prices tor your area. Subject to a small price protection premium of 2.25% above our standard variable prices for domestic electricity customers and 3.5% for domestic gas customers, which will be applicable when we have notified you. Offer not available to prepayment customers. If you cancel the contract, we may add a charge to your next electricity/gas bill. If our standard variable prices drop below the prices on 1st April 2005 during the period of this agreement, the price protection premium rate will apply on the revised prices. Limited availability. Information correct as at 1st February 2005. Other conditions apply. "Monthly Direct Debit scheme is provided free of charge by British Gas Trading Limited. Subject trj status. ‘ Discount compares payment for electricity by monthly Direct Debit to payment by quarterly cash or cheque on an annual consumption of 3,300 kWh (single rate meter) and is subject to not having an overdue electricity account. Discount is rounded and varies according to existing consumption. Includes VAT at 5%. '•The £15 discount is applied to the'electricity account pro rata on a daily basis. Includes VAT at 5”/o. Discount is not available to prepayment, business or rion domestic customers and is subject to taking gas and electricity from British Gas. “ Discount compares payment for gas by monthly Direct Debit to payment by quarterly cash/cheque more than 10 days after bill issue dale on an annual consumption of 20,500 kWh and is subject to not having an overdue gas account. Discount is rounded and varies according to existing consumption. Includes VAT at 5%. ‘ For full details and rules of Paperless Billing go to www.house.co.uk/paperless. The £5 payment is made at the end of one year's unbroken online billing. Includes VAT at 5%. This discount will not be applied if you have received more than one red reminder in the same period. Excludes prepayment customers. tCalls may be monitored and/or recorded for quality assurance.


Norman Cope Opticians


Are pleased to announce that Mrs Diane Hunt is returning to.Clitheroe and will be pleased to see patients old and new on Wednesdays by appointment


11 Castle Street, Clitheroe BB7 2BT Telephone.Ol 200 423975


Destruction on a


massive scale THE Kibble Valley District Group of the Campaign to Protect Rural England has obtained a document which appears to set out the details of the proposed Forest of Rowland Visitor Centre development in Gis- bumForest. It makes horrific reading for any­


one who is concerned to protect the rural environment from dubious economic development at the expense of the very features which are the heart of the areas attractive­ ness. As the document says Gisburn forest is “an undiscovered and untouched countryside just waiting for the high spending visitor to expe­ rience and explore.” CPRE ques­ tions the truth of the first part of the statement. The very fact of its remoteness and Tvildness in a coun­ ty not over blessed with remote and wild places means that its “discov­ ery” has perhaps been limited - to those who appreciate remote and wild places. As to the second part of the statement CPRE is horiified at what this will mean. Let us enlight­ en you. "The High Spending Visitor (only


one?) apparently will require: • An interpretation and informa­


tion area • A conference centre • Offices and workshop space • Gallery (Purpose unspecified


but arty-crMty in a City centre way = a mini shopping mall?) 0 Cafe/restaurant 0 Food and craft hall 0 Commercial kitchen and butch­


ery


0 Cold store 0 Smoke house 0 External eating area 0 Toilets . Accommodation; 012 high-quality three/four bed­


room chalets O Owner’s/manager’s accommo­


dation Other facilities: 0 50-space car park (will 50 be


enough for such a grand scheme?) 0 Livery centre 0 Internal site access including


ambulant disabled footpaths 0 Bird hides Actually CPRE would be happy


to see a visitor centre in the forest provided that its scale, design and facilities were in keeping with the nature of the area, and that might ’ include some of the items on the list. But surely “facilities” on this scale to be deposited in this are where the local lanes are all single track and


where there is only slightly wider main road, where there is practically no local unemployment, \yhich


would mean that all the staff would have to come from outside the area by car, since there is no appropriate public transport, are just a mockery of all that an area of outstanding natural beauty is supposed to be. CPRE is disappointed and sur­


prised that Lancashire County Council (with Blackpool) allegedly leads the consortium for the propos­ al, and that Ribble Valley Borough Council is included with the local parish councils as being in favour of the development. CPRE believes that the supposed guardians of the Forest of Rowland ANOB may also be in favour. The cost of the devel­ opment gives a clear indication of its size and unsuitability for the Gis­ burn Forest. In total it is estimated that it Mil cost £2.2million of which some £690,000 will come from pri­ vate sources. I t looks as though someone is pretty sure that they can make substantial financial gains out of an area which deserves to be left alone rather than suffer an avowedly upmarket retail and commercial development. There is much more in the docu­


ment that we have received, but this letter already exceeds your preferred length. The time to object will come when the plans are submitted to Ribble Valley and the County Council. The trouble is that they are the very people who support this development. When, in our local councils one of the members has a personal interest he declares it and takes no part in the decision. Sadly there is no similar provision tor such integrity on the part of the whole planning bodies where these propos­ als will be decided.


DAVID KING, Chairman, Ribble Valley District Group and Lancashire Branch CPRE, Carr’s Croft, Rimington Copy to Lancashire County Council Ribble Valley Borough Council Nigel Evans M P


This facility will


benefit no one ALONG with the vast majority of residents and visitors to the Bow- land area, I am horrified at the plan to build a large visitor centre near to Stocks Reservoir. It would provide unwanted com­ petition to existing tourism busi­


nesses and be of no benefit to the local community. ■


Surveys have shown that most


visitors appreciate the natural beau­ ty of the area and do not wish to see any changes, I have been told that the ofificial target figure is 100,000 visitors a year (say about 25,000 cars!). This would inevitably change the character of the area and cause pollution, traffic congestion and great environmental damage. The facilities proposed on the new


site can all be provided by existing enterprises in the area. We owe it to our own and future generations to preserve the true rural character of the area and make it clear that the imposition of an up-market holiday camp is quite unacceptable.


ALLAN HEYES, Beck House, Tosside


Poor thanks to a


remarkable man REGARDING the article on Keith Lord’s retirement from Clitheroe Football Club, we have known Keith for over 35 years and in all that time, he has never missed a match (home or away) except for holidays, illness arid the weddings of his two sons. Keith has dedicated his life to


Shawbridge doing untold tasks including laundering the kit, (which until recently his wife Peggy did at home in the family washing machine), painting, cleaning, fund­ raising, besides all the other posi­ tions you mentioned in your article and all this for no pay. He has never received any remu­


neration for his efforts, so to read in the Clitheroe Advertiser and Times that his position as “groundsman” was going to be a paid position in the future must be like a kick in the teeth for him. We were also dismayed to hear


that after more than 50 years of service, Keith was rewarded with a bottle of brandy. Could the com­ mittee not have had something engraved with his name and years of service to the club? Soihething he could look back on with pride in years to come and pass on to his sons and grandsons? Come on Clitheroe FC, get your­


selves together and give this selfless supporter the recognition and “send off” he richly deserves.


TERRENCE AND DOROTHY SUNTER, Millthorne Avenue, Clithcroc


Your Home


Write to: The Editor, Clithcrue Advertiser and Times, S King Street, Clitheroe BB72EW vivien.ineath(geastlancsnews.co.uk


Who will finance


my pension fund? I WOULD like to take issue with Coun. Richard Sherras over his let­ ter in last week’s Clitheroe Adver­ tiser and Times in which he seems to suggest that the reason for the increase to parking fees at Roefield is to pay for council employee pen­ sions. Who, may I ask, is going to pay


for the extra money I need to pay into my pension? I will now have less spare money to put into my pension due to the increase in park­ ing fees. He also states that next year they will have to find £190,000 and £260,000 the following year. Who is going to pay for this you may ask? Is Coun. Sherras propos­ ing to increase parking again over the next two years, or is he propos­ ing to increase council tax by a large amount? It seems more than co-incidence th a t this year’s increase was much lower than usual. Could this have been because there was an election looming? I think people can work that one out for themselves.


GRAHAM A. CUNLIFFE, Rimington


Charges may hurt


centre’s future WITHOUT wanting to be a regu­ lar on this page, I feel I have to respond to Coun. Hill’s letter last week regarding car parking at Roe- field Leisure and Ribblesdale Pool. I t was a most unsympathetic


response to the plight of the users of the pool or the sports centre and not once did he refer to the financial implications falling on the users, but chose instead to launch a scathing attack on the manager of Roefield, someone who over the past 10 years has worked hard to promote the facility with limited funds. ; I felt he came across as negative,


and critical, focusing on the-past rather than the future. To quote figures as he did is just


asking for further investigation into the actual funding regarding Roe­ field and Longridge Sports Centres. I feel the Ribble Valley should


subsidise Roefield and confine to find ways of making the leisure card scheme work, adding more money to the project, not with­ drawing what was existing funding, of £17,000. This.can only make the situation worse for Roefield and the users causing rises in charges to make up for the shortfall. Increased charges would question


the future of Roefield, leaving a large area of the Ribble Valley without a facility for sport, espe­ cially for young people and those not able to afford the other health clubs in the area in a time when we are supposed to be promoting a healthy, fitter lifestyle. The suggestion of using the rela­


tively small staff parking area for a drop-off point was totally ludi­ crous. Had he any concept of the amount of parents dropping off and collecting at certain times he would see quite clearly what a haz­ ard it would be as this area is too small to turn round, has a narrow


entrance and cars have to reverse back into a busy main road, some­ thing that has been stopped for health and safety reasons. Regarding the comments on


parking at Blackburn and Burnley to use sports facilities, most of those that provide comparable facilities to Roefield and Ribbles­ dale Pool are situated on the edge of town and have free car parks, and the Thompson Centre in Burn­ ley operates a refund policy on its car park. These toivns have regular public transport services. The users of Roefield Leisure and


Ribblesdale Pool are still extremely angry about the ivithdrawal of the refund facility arid wdll not let this matter drop. We have had a great response to


the petition already, with the sup-' port of a nuiriber of councillors and many retailers in town who have been willing to make the petition available to people who ivish to help support a reversal of this decision. Apart from Roefield Leisure


Centre, the petition can be found at the following: Harrison and Kerr, butchers; the Clitheroe Advertiser and Times office; Seasons House of Fashion; DJP Domestics; The Emporium; the Waddington Arms, Sainsbury’s and Hargreaves Cycles and Electrical. I can only presume that those


members on the committee that took this decision were not fully aware of the facts or implications to the users of the pool and leisure facilities at the time and ask them to review the situation.


RUTH HARGREAVES. Not everyone can


walk to exercise I AM \vriting in response to several letters in last week’s paper that seem to have anomilies. Mr Hill stated that all the whole


council endorsed the decision. That’s funny, because I know mine didn't! Mr Hill also stated that the area


in front of Roefield, which is used by their staff, should be a drop-off point for children. I remember when it was and it was far too dangerous. Access is narrow, Lvith a sharp bend and no room to turn mthout revers­ ing. Every driver has probably had their car scraped at some time, at least once, by someone reversing due to the driver not being able to see all four comers of their car - or maybe they have done so themselves. Cars can take that sort of knock, at finan­ cial cost, but children are far more


vulnerable. Ms Waddington suggests every­


one should walk there and stop com­ plaining. From her address, I can see she lives ivithin a mile of the swim­ ming baths and from the annoyance in her letter she is obviously able to walk distances of that length and beyond. What she has not realised are the difficulties and/or impossi-. bilitios her suggestion would cause many users of the swimming baths


and Roefield:-. I, for one, have developed mobili­


ty problems and it is on medical grounds that I swim three times a week and I am hoping it will stave off the day when I ivill need a “dis- ability'”parking ticket. Today, I parked near St Paul's


Editorial e-niuil;


and walked to the baths without any problems. However the walk back was another story - the weight of my wet costume and soggy towel in my bag was upsetting my balance and caused me further pain. When I was younger I was able to


walk miles and enjoyed doing so. Now I cannot and have to swim instead. Many of the regular swim­ mers are swimming on medical advice and the “Fitness for Life” concession does not mean they are entitled to it for life - only a short period. The swimming baths, tennis courts and gym don’t just serve the people of Clitheroe, but the whole area of the Ribble Valley, with peo­ ple from outside the borough using them too. Are they expected to walk that distance - and with children in tow ? No one has mentioned that the


cost of swimming has gone up too. No one has mentioned that most


of the activities take an hour or more (including parking, queueing, changing, the activity, showering, changing and returning to the car park). Indeed, the tennis court is hired for the hour, with tennis les­ sons taking an hour - and some les-- sons at Roefield are for more than an hour, so the cost of parking, without risking a ticket, is 70p. No one has mentioned that par­


ents dropping off and collecting chil­ dren will have to pay twice. Accord­ ing to a council worker, if they leave the car park in between, their ticket is invalid! I expect we will see several drivers, in their cars, waiting on the road, facing the towm. No one has mentioned that for


those people who have bought a longrterm car park season ticket, they are now unable to use it there because it is now a short-term car park! (Workers at the council office have the benefit of a using a long term car park season ticket - and a ' very short walk tool). On these last three issues, some­


thing needs to be done to prevent losing revenue for the council due to the short sighted decisions. My suggestions are:- O Reinstate the ref und - retaining


20p instead of lOp per ticket for both 35p and 70p tickets


, 0 Reinstate the “long tei-m” sta­


tus - and for the whole year not just the summer 0 Allow parents dropping off and


collecting their children to return within the two hour period 1 believe that these three sugges­


tions will maintain the number of people using the facilities and encourage drivers to use the car park, rather than use the Ediford Road to park, which will increase that income too.-


CONCERNED SWIMMER ' O More letters on this issue and


: : V > others liiivc bceii held over


• The Editor welcomes letters on any subject, but correspondents are reminded that contributions may be edited or condensed, must not exceed 3.10 words and should reach us by noon on Tuesday. Letters with nums de plume are only accepted for publi­ cation if tlie editor aqrees that there is a valid reason for the writer’s identity to be witbheld. These letters must, however, include the writer’s name and full postal address.


In l^ b a in ( ^ Costa Blarica^Calida & Almeria


"'m Apartments from £66,000 ; ‘Maisonettes from £75,000


' Villas from £109,000 ,


Resales efrom £59,000' „ , « Established for 24 years w * ^


, • 30,000 homes already sold rea & Property Tours from £49


: • FREE furniture pack with all new homes •„€500 towards;white gbocis ^ ‘ with'ariy new home


Showcases Saturday 14th May 2005,11 am - 5pm


Royal & Swan Hotel Castle Street, Clitheroe Sunday 15th May 2005,11am - 5pm


The Oaks Hotel, Colne Road, Burnley


Come along and speak to one of our experienced advisors in a friendiy and relaxed atmosphere - bring this advert to enter our free prize draw tor a case of Spanish wine-


- ^


For details please call 01706 710413


©IISO 9001 Your guarantee of quality


I ^ j r


I N T E R N A T I O N A L


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48