Company insight

Allen-Miles explains. “Similar configuration mixes could be used to support reconnaissance or scout missions and even static base defence. Lethal effectors can also be replaced with non-lethal effectors to limit escalation or casualties.” Given the vast array of potential configurations, Moog had to ensure that changing between them would be as simple as possible, considering the myriad different direct and indirect fire weapons that its customers might want to use. “Developing the suite of adaption technologies and mechanical interfaces was key to this,” Allen-Miles says. “It also required an intimate software-l evel understanding of how missiles communicate with fire control systems. Our long pedigree in this area enables us to offer unmatched firing performance whatever the weapons configuration.”

Plugging the capability gap Capacity and flexibility are what makes RIwP stand out from other RWS systems. “Capacity is key,” says Allen-Miles. “A user who buys RIwP is acquiring the ability to host whatever weapons they need to, now and in the future. Imagine trying to mount a four-missile Hellfire pod on any other RWS.”

“RIwP fills a genuine capability gap,” he adds. “It delivers warfighter protection in an endlessly reconfigurable format and therefore offers more firepower pound for pound than anything else available.” To develop such a flexible platform, Moog engaged with many partners in the land forces community to define the capability gap. This in-depth process of consultation identified two key aspirations: to create a weapons platform that offers a warfighter protection under amour to mitigate the risks associated with leaving a vehicle to reload weapons, and to offer weapons capability that assured constant overmatch regardless of the nature of the threat or the mission.

“Moog has been providing turret control and stabilisation systems for many of the world’s most widely used weapons systems for decades, so we understand at a fundamental level what it takes to make a weapons platform or turret perform at its best,” Allen-Miles explains. “We know all the forces, disturbances and considerations that must be taken into account when designing the actuation system.”

Furthermore, Moog is well aware that modern military vehicles and their crews are increasingly exposed to multiple and evolving threats and, consequently, can be called upon to fulfil many different roles – whether it be counter insurgency, counter-drone (C-UAS), short-range air defence (SHORAD), anti-armour or any other task. “We felt that even the best weapons platforms do not easily allow a vehicle to adapt to these differing roles and threats – they are, in effect, one trick ponies,” Allen- Miles remarks. “We designed RIwP to address this shortcoming: a weapons platform that matched or exceeded the firing performance of the very best weapons platforms, but one that also allowed the users to quickly change out the weapons sets.”

maintenance formation desired, reducing the need to return to depot or the manufacturer, and is versatile in ways that other RWS platforms are not. It is no surprise, then, that is has already attracted significant interest. Leonardo DRS has opted to supply 28 RIwP turrets for the US Army’s Maneuver Short-Range Air Defense Increment 1 (M-SHORAD Inc. 1) programme, in a configuration that integrates multiple kinetic effectors including the XM914 30mm cannon and M240 7.62mm machine gun, along with Stinger and Longbow Hellfire missiles. It also features L3Harris’ MX-GCS sighting systems and Moog’s own Hellfire missile launcher. “No matter what the weapons configuration, the RIwP cupola and

“RIwP fills a genuine capability gap [...] It delivers warfighter protection in an endlessly reconfigurable format and therefore offers more firepower pound for pound than anything else available.”

Drawing on its intimate knowledge of gun control systems, Moog designed RIwP to offer unparalleled accuracy no matter the weapons configuration. At the same time, however, the company recognised that by solving one problem it must not create another, namely that of multiple different user interfaces. So, it designed RIwP to present users with the same fire control system and user interface regardless of the weapons set. “The complex, hybrid nature of modern conflicts means that a vehicle, unit or formation may need to overcome manned or unmanned air assault, infantry attack, medium and heavy armour or insurgent attacks,” says Allen-Miles. “RIwP enables a vehicle to meet each challenge and enter each engagement equipped with the weapons configuration necessary in order to overcome it, instead of being constrained by the weapons set originally installed on the vehicle, as is the case with all other RWS and weapons platforms.”

Evolution follows revolution RIwP is quick and easy to reconfigure for trained technicians at the lowest military

Defence & Security Systems International /

associated internal sub-components are the same,” Allen-Miles remarks. “One design, one set of spares, 85% commonality. And because the user interface is the same no matter what the configuration, a user trained on RIwP can effectively fire any direct or indirect weapon.” “We have interest from land forces all over the globe, ranging from C-UAS and air defence communities to combat brigade weapons systems users, logistical planners, and proponents of commonality and modularity within a host of armed forces,” he continues.

Moog is planning to continue working with military and government partners to explore new technologies, including making RIwP compatible with new sensor and effector technologies, equipping AI capability to allow human-in-the-loop (HITL) semi-autonomous operation and, ultimately, positioning it as a weapons platform uniquely suited to robotics and unmanned vehicle applications. As the rules of the battlefield change, RIwP is well positioned to stay firmly ahead of the game. ● 43

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77