search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sweeteners Sugar tax J


ust a few centuries ago, sugar was an unimaginable luxury to all but the rich and powerful. As late as 1700, the per-capita consumption of the typical Briton was less than 10lb, although your average tenant farmer probably enjoyed far less than that. The rise of modern industrialisation – to say nothing of a globalised economy that cheapened imports – would change everything. By the turn of the 20th century, most Victorians


were guzzling around 60lb of sugar each year. And by the time of the 21st, that figure had doubled, with biscuits and muffins now making up a stomach- churning proportion of the British diet. Obviously, the UK is far from alone here. Across the developed world, a bonanza of processed food has transformed national cuisines; with consequences that span from bad to terrible. That’s true


when considering the effect on the individual body,


of course, with diabetes and heart disease being only two illnesses that could blight those addicted to sugar. But more than that, an excess of sugar can often have broader societal consequences. To return to the UK, for instance, recent government research estimates that treating obesity, of which sugar is doubtless a contributing factor, directly costs the NHS some £6bn each year. Not even the most laissez faire minister could hope to close


66 Ingredients Insight / wwwIngredients Insight / www.ingredients-.ingredients-insight.cominsight.com


gone flat?


Attempts at reducing sugar consumption are well-documented, with one notable example being the success of the sugar tax on fi zzy drinks in the UK. But with the broader food industry struggling to reach voluntary 20% targets – no thanks to a lack of enforcement from the government – what’s next in the fi ght against the white stuff? Andrea Valentino speaks to Professor Graham MacGregor of Queen Mary University of London and Jane DeVille-Almond of the British Obesity Society to learn more.


their eyes to a tax bill that large. It’s unsurprising, then, that politicians of all stripes have spent years battling the exploding scourge of sugar, promoting everything from healthy eating campaigns to advertising limits in the media.


Andrii Zastrozhnov/Shutterstock.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90