search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BELOW THE HOOK Ӏ NOVEMBER 2022


j ‘Sarens Spider’, allows safe


and precise lifting and positioning, especially in cases where increased accuracy is vital. The SarSpin is a set of hydraulic cylinders with four legs, (not eight, despite the name). It can handle loads up to 220 tonnes and gives operators precise control of individual sling loads and stroke adjustments. Its operators use a central computer to control the SarSpin system, constantly monitoring tension and stroke in each cylinder for precise lifting and positioning. In this way they guide tensioning and load distribution at all lift points, minimising deformation to a client’s load. SarSpin enables them to compensate for load deflections, level out a load, and optimise load distribution. A SarSpin setup of three or four


hydraulic cylinders can not only be used to control the level of a load, but the position of its outer corners, which is useful during operations like bridge installations. Or a setup of multiple SarSpin cylinders mounted vertically at each lifting point can be used for load and deflection control of larger loads that have multiple lifting points. SarSpin is often combined with


a customised spreader system to control and equalise the tackle or lifting frame at every lifting point. Although it was originally designed to replace spreaders, on most occasions small spreaders are still used to prevent the SarSpin systems from bumping into each other while without a load. Its use, says Sarens, has proved indispensible for many projects and hugely helpful for others. Without it, for example, deflection control of lighter loads could still be achieved with chain blocks, but these don’t have the advantage of a load and stroke readout. Strandjacks could also be used, but they have a larger stroke and require much more preparation


Mammoet goes nuclear


A heavy lift by Mammoet in a nuclear facility required even the slings and support straps to be checked for radiation. The Lingen nuclear power plant in Germany is in the process of being decommissioned. Mammoet was assigned to remove the two steam converters, each weighing around 155t, from the control area of the power plant. Each would need to be moved vertically and then tilted to a horizontal orientation, before being lifted from the building to waiting transportation below. Due to the high radiation


protection requirements on site, the entire tooling, equipment and 100t of fabricated steelwork had to pass special radiation checks before being brought into the control area. This considerable time factor had to be taken into account in the planning so that the overall deadline could be met. Before executing the lift all core components including the support strap,


temporary lifting device and the skidding beam for the transverse skidding operation were subjected to a thorough load test. Then the support strap had to be installed onto the fi rst steam converter. Due to its installation position in a narrow housing, the upright positioned component was diffi cult to access and fi rst had to be jacked up with hydraulic climbing jacks and moved laterally. After the support strap – properly radiation-safe- was attached, the


temporary lifting device took over the steam converter. It was pushed out of the housing centimeter by centimeter with a skidding device and fi nally placed precisely onto a skidding track. The now horizontal steam converter was then rotated by 90 degrees and lowered. In this position, the large component could be removed from the control


area to a gantry built several storeys high against the building exterior. Due to interfering edges and the narrow diameter of the opening, only a few centimeters of clearance were available to perform the operation. After removal, the steam converter was lifted from this portal gantry in a tandem operation, by a 1200-tonne and a 750-tonne mobile crane, and loaded for transport on the power plant site. The second steam converter followed in the same procedure. Lastly, four subcoolers were moved, lifted and handed over to the customer for loading into special containers.


and maintenance. Controlling a load using a single crane and the SarSpin system offers a valuable advantage: it avoids having to use two cranes for a tandem lift, which in turn reduces costs and increases safety. SarSpin can also replace a typical spreader combination to achieve a lower rigging height. The equalising function of the spreaders, in that case, is replaced by the SarSpin’s


load control. At the Hinkley Point C


nuclear site in the UK six 200-tonne capacity SarSpin units, combined with the SGC- 250 crane, were used to equalise tackle weighing 700 tonnes. A project in Kazakhstan has lifted a 1.600-tonne capacity frame using twelve 200-tonne and 22 150-tonne SarSpin combined with the Sarens SGC-140 crane.


CRANES TODAY 137


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161