search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
SAFETY PERFORMANCE OF DAMS IN CHILE’S HIGHLY SEISMIC ENVIRONMENT 2.2.3 Valparaíso earthquake, 1985


On 3rd March 1985, in the central part of Chile occurred an earthquake of Mw = 8.0. Figure 9 presents selected acceleration records from the 1985 and 2010 seismic events, where it is possible


to observe the differences in terms of amplitudes and durations for the same stations.


Figure 9. Acceleration records of the Valparaíso (1985) and Maule (2010) earthquakes[4]


The seismic event of 1985 confirmed a quite systematic sequence of earthquakes that have occurred in this part of Chile. This sequence has been inferred from the large earthquakes which occurred in this area in 1575, 1647, 1730, 1822, 1906 and 1985. This sequence can be characterized by an average period of 82 years ± 6 years[6]. The aftershocks of the 1985 earthquake defined a rupture area of 170km by 110km. The main shock was the result of two shocks; the first motion began at 22:46:56 and then a larger event took place at 22:47:07 (Greenwich Mean Time). The maximum peak accelerations were recorded at the Llolleo seismic station, reaching a vertical component value of 0.85g, whereas the maximum peak horizontal component reached a value of 0.67g (N10E).


This situation of a larger vertical acceleration has deserved important studies regarding its effect on the stability of civil structures. However, in other stations such as Melipilla, the peak horizontal accelerations were larger than the vertical component: 0.67g in the north- south component and 0.59g in the vertical component[7].


Besides the enormous damage to buildings, industrial structures, ports, roads, and infrastructure in general, there was significant impact to some small earth dams and tailings dams, but only minor damages on large earth dams, as discussed in Chapters 3 to 6.


Vol XXXI Issue 3


DAM ENGINEERING


193


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95