search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ALKALI-AGGREGATE REACTIVITY EVALUATION OF AGGREGATES FOR APPLICATION IN INDIAN CONCRETE DAMS


However, for aggregates CA-1 and CA-4, in which expansion was slightly above 0.2% and no alternate sources of coarse aggregates were available locally for construction of dams, the use of supplementary cementitious materials along with OPC was investigated to mitigate the phenomenon of potential alkali-aggregate reactivity. For coarse aggregate CA-1, the accelerated mortar bar test as per ASTM C-1567 on coarse aggregate sample CA-1 was carried out with cementitious combination of 80% OPC + 20% flyash + 8% silica fume. The expansion at 14 days after casting was found to be 0.02%, which is less than the prescribed limit of 0.1% (maximum), and is likely to produce acceptable expansion when tested in concrete (i.e. test method ASTM C-1293) and have a low risk of deleterious expansion when used in concrete under field conditions. Hence, it was suggested that coarse aggregate sample CA-1 should be used with the aforementioned cementitious combination for preparation of concrete in the field. For coarse aggregate CA-4, alkali-aggregate reactivity in combination with cementitious materials (OPC + flyash) and aggregate was determined as per ASTM C-1567 (Accelerated Mortar Bar Method). The flyash was used as 20% and 25% by weight of cementitious materials in the experiment, and expansion after 14 days was found to be less than 0.1% when replacement level was kept at 20%, which is termed as safe against alkali-silica reaction. Expansion was further reduced with the replacement level of 25% flyash. Hence, it was suggested that coarse aggregate sample CA-4 should be used with the aforementioned cementitious combination for preparation of concrete in the field.


5. Conclusions Based on the aforementioned studies the following conclusions were drawn:


i) Before using aggregates in mass concrete structures such as dams, in addition to their physical and mechanical properties, other performance characteristics such as their expansion potential due to alkali-aggregate reaction, which is directly related to the mineral composition, texture and petrogenesis of the rock particles that make up aggregates, should be evaluated.


ii) The aggregates which were found potentially reactive and deleterious from the accelerated mortar bar test either contained high amounts of amorphous silica in the form of quartz (CA-1 and CA-4), or high amounts of carbonates (CA-2) as confirmed from the petrographic studies.


iii) The mitigation of alkali-aggregate reaction in the case of doubtful and potentially less reactive aggregates to be used in dam structures can be achieved using supplementary cementitious materials such as flyash, silica fume, etc. in different proportions, as seen from the study. It is recommended that individual combinations of aggregate be evaluated with the proposed mitigative materials before acceptance of the aggregate for use in dams. These mitigative materials have generally been found to be effective in making many potentially reactive aggregates safe for use. However, dam authorities should carefully evaluate reactive aggregates before their approval for use.


Vol XXXI Issue 3 DAM ENGINEERING 181


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95