search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ALKALI-AGGREGATE REACTIVITY EVALUATION OF AGGREGATES FOR APPLICATION IN INDIAN CONCRETE DAMS


(ii) Petrographic examination (ASTM C 295)[11]


Mineral composition is a good indicator of potential aggregate reactivity. The Guide for Petrographic Examination of Aggregates for Concrete, ASTM C 295, is used to determine mineral composition and form. Petrographic examination is basically a qualitative analysis, and should be used as a preliminary examination for aggregates. A petrographic evaluation of an aggregate sample by an experienced petrographer will identify potentially reactive minerals in an aggregate sample. It gives quick results to help predict possible aggregate reactivity, but is unable to provide quantitative information about the aggregate’s actual behaviour in concrete. Correlating the results of a petrographic analysis with the service record of the aggregate in concrete is very useful. The results of a petrographic analysis will not reveal whether an aggregate will cause deleterious expansion in concrete. This needs to be evaluated using other test methods.


(iii) Accelerated Mortar-Bar Test (ASTM C 1260)[12]


Assessing aggregate reactivity by accelerated methods is becoming increasingly common. The shortcomings of ASTM C 227 and C 289 prompted development of a rapid test method for assessing the potential reactivity of aggregate. ASTM C 1260, a test method for the potential alkali reactivity of aggregates, offers a relatively rapid test to supplement lengthier test methods. It involves measuring the length change of mortar bars made with sample aggregate stored in a strongly alkaline solution at an elevated temperature. This test measures potential aggregate reactivity, not reactivity of specific cement-aggregate combinations. ASTM C 1260 classifies an expansion of 0.10% or less, at 14 days, as innocuous behaviour. Expansions of more than 0.20% are indicative of potentially deleterious expansion. Between 0.10% and 0.20%, aggregates may exhibit either innocuous or deleterious behaviour in field performance. ASTM C 1260 (AASHTO T 303) should be used as a screening test in conjunction with other tests to determine the potential reactivity of an aggregate. ASTM C 1260’s severe test conditions make it useful for identifying slow reacting aggregates, which may not be identified by ASTM C 289.


(iv) Concrete Prism Test (ASTM C 1293)[13]


The Standard Test Method for concrete aggregates by determination of length change of concrete due to alkali-silica reaction, ASTM C 1293, measures the expansion of concrete prisms made


with the fine or coarse aggregate in question, and a Type I high-alkali (0.90% ± 0.10% Na2O equivalent) cement plus added NaOH to simulate a 1.25% Na2O equivalent cement. Concrete proportions are strictly defined, including a water-cement ratio of 0.42 to 0.45. Measurements


of concrete prisms are taken at different specified intervals for 12 months. This standard offers the following interpretation of results: potentially deleterious behaviour is indicated if the one-year expansion is greater than or equal to 0.04%. ASTM C 1293 is currently considered the most representative test method when compared to structures in the field. C 1293 should be used to supplement results obtained from C 289, C 295, C 1260 (AASHTO T 303), or


Vol XXXI Issue 3 DAM ENGINEERING 169


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95