search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MIGUEL RODRIGUES, SERGIO OLIVEIRA, JOSE NUNO LIMA & JORGE PROENCA


where, at that point, it changes from convex to concave (inflection point), moving then towards stabilization. The referred swelling curve inflection point is also named the half-swelling point. Alternatively, the swelling effect can be represented by a polynomial function. The use of a polynomial or sigmoid-type function depends on the one that better adjusts itself to the observed data.


The independent term, k, is included in the model so it can take into account the initial observation (the first campaign of the analysed period).


With this formulation, an HSCT model curve adjusted to the observation values is obtained (see Figure 7) by applying the Least Squares Method (LSM). It is important to emphasize that before applying the LSM the SW creep component can be removed from the observed values, and corrected observed values are obtained for HSCT separation of effects analyses. To acquire reliable results for the HSCT-FEM outputs it is convenient to have observations in quantity, preferably obtained with assured quality and well distributed over time, where observed values are present for each season of the year, and at water levels representative of all the reservoir filling levels.


5.3. Applied HSCT-FEM model


This paper presents the measured displacement histories with the use of the plumbline, triangulation and GNSS methods.


Considering the methodology presented in the previous sub-chapter, after testing multiple regression model variations the HSCT-FEM model, which presented the best global adjustment involving all observed dam points, had the following characteristics: (i) for the HP elastic


effect estimation one exponential function with a cf value of 25 was considered (although, it is important to note that for the analysis of the plumblines an additional exponential with a


cf value of 20 was considered because at the analyzed locations, with the water level rise from empty reservoir to maximum capacity, there is not a monotonic increase in the measured displacements and, therefore, one exponential function alone cannot adjust itself correctly to the observable data because of its monotonic nature. Such a result is easily observable in the top left graphs of Figure 7 and Figure 8; additionally, considering the location of the plumbline points near the embankments, and the usual difficulty for the separation of effects models to adequately estimate the behaviour on those locations, the FEM results were used to draw the HP influence line); (ii) the temperature effect is estimated from the observed daily average air temperature considering an 18 day delay to simulate the heat wave propagation throughout the concrete; (iii) the HP creep effect is simulated by the creep coefficients application to the elastic response for the monthly water level history discretization in constant intervals, and considering


a concrete material with a Bazant and Panula creep law in which E0 = 25GPa, ϕ1 = 2.64, β = 0.042, m= 0.441 and n = 0.168, matching a concrete moderately damaged by swelling (there is evidence of swelling reaction occurrence from gel exudations at the upper inspection gallery); (iv) the self-weight creep effect is estimated using the same creep coefficient application to the elastic displacements determined by the FEM for the SW action; (v) the time effect related to


158 DAM ENGINEERING Vol XXXI Issue 3


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95