search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FAIR COMPENSATION


THE CRIMINAL INJURIES COMPENSATION AUTHORITY


IS NOT FIT FOR PURPOSE


Policing Minister has an opportunity to demonstrate a fresh start by addressing PFEW’s concerns in her first 100 days


The snap election, whilst possibly causing some frustration to our efforts lobbying for policy changes in a number of areas, has presented the new Minister of State for Crime, Policing and Fire with an easy win for her first 100 days in office. We have long argued that the UK Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority (CICA) is failing in its suitability and effectiveness in compensating police officers injured on duty. We, the Police Federation of England


and Wales, have identified several key issues that highlight the CICA’s inadequacy in addressing the unique circumstances and challenges faced by our members.


28 | POLICE | AUGUST | 2024


Previous presentations to the then


Policing Minister, Chris Philp MP, were received well and he demonstrated a grasp


“I have been briefed on the criteria for access to this scheme and as I pointed out, this seems flawed and not fit for purpose for police officers who face risk, danger and violence on a daily basis.”


of the issues we have with the CICA in its current state as demonstrated by previous communications: The Minister commented: “I have been briefed on the criteria for access to this scheme and as I pointed out, this seems flawed and not fit for purpose for police officers who face risk, danger and


violence on a daily basis. The current CICA eligibility criteria outlined in the Criminal Injuries Compensation Scheme 2012 provides two obvious points of contention for emergency workers. “The first point in question is found under para. 4 which states: ‘a person may be eligible


for an award under this Scheme if they sustain a criminal injury which is


directly attributable to their being a direct victim of a crime of violence’. “This criterion does not account for the likelihood of indirect or collateral injury for emergency workers as described above. The second point in question is found under para 5 (1) and 5 (2) ‘A person may be eligible for an award


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56