search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The Law Commission is an independent body with a statutory remit to modernise and simplify the law. The Government has indicated that it wants the review to be underpinned by a deregulatory objective commen- surate with maintaining satisfactory levels of safety. Beyond that, the Law Commission has been charged with carrying out a root and branch review with a view to providing recommendations and drawing up a draft Bill.


Against that background, the Government is clear that this response should not fetter the discretion that has been given to the Law Commis- sion. Whilst it is entirely reasonable for the Government to give an indication of what it thinks of each of the Committee's recommendations, it must be stressed that in doing so, the Government is not intending to lead the Law Commission towards a particular conclusion or close off any particular avenue of consideration.


RECOMMENDATIONS


Recommendation 1: In our view, the case for a thorough overhaul of the legislation relating to taxis and private hire vehicles is irresistible. (Para- graph 14)


DfT response: The Government agrees that there is a strong case for overhauling the legislation governing taxis and private hire vehicles. That is why the Government has asked the Law Commission to undertake a comprehensive review of the legislation.


Recommendation 2: We recommend that, instead of referring reform of taxi and PHV legislation to the Law Commission, the Government should engage with the trade, local authorities and users about the objectives of future legislation on taxis and private hire vehicles and commit to overhaul that legislation during the course of this Parliament. Once these objectives are decided, the detailed work to frame legislation and guide it through Parliament should begin. This need not involve primary legislation: we consider that the swifter legislative reform order procedure could be used in this case. (Paragraph 15)


DfT response: The Government does not consider that referring the review of taxi and PHV legislation to the Law Commission is in any way inappro- priate. On the contrary, the Government considers that the Law Commission is the ideal body to undertake such a review. Its fundamental purpose is to review complex areas of law, it has experience and expertise in carrying out


this function and with its independent status comes an ability to assess the issues in an objective way. The Government is satisfied that the Law Com- mission will undertake an effective and productive review, the final report of which will be delivered during the lifetime of the current Parliament.


The Government is not inclined towards the legislative reform order route to establish a new legislative framework for taxis and PHVs. Whilst the Gov- ernment expects the draft Bill produced by the Law Commission to have a good degree of support, there will be substantive and controversial issues to be addressed and the Government considers that these would best be considered and debated during the passage of a Bill through Parliament


PRINCIPLES TO UNDERPIN NEW LEGISLATION


Recommendation 3: We recommend that, in developing proposals for changing the legislation applying to taxis and PHVs, the Government should commission authoritative research into consumers' opinions. Par- ticular attention should be paid to the views of vulnerable groups, such as disabled people, who are often most reliant on taxis and PHVs. (Paragraph 18)


DfT response: The Government accepts that seeking the views of users is a vital element of undertaking any reform of the taxi and PHV legislation. The Government does not, however, accept that a dedicated research project is needed. The Law Commission will engage with consumer organisations - in order to gain a full understanding of the views of every- one with a stake in this sector - as part of its review of the legislation.


Recommendation 4: We recommend that the Town Police Clauses Act 1847 and the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 should be replaced by a single Act or legislative reform order, covering both taxis and PHVs. (Paragraph 19)


DfT response: The Government notes this recommendation. Without wanting to preempt the Law Commissions review, it seems clear that a sensible and desirable outcome from the review would be a single Act of Parliament covering both taxis and private hire vehicles. 


OPINION CONTINUED ON PAGE 48


Fleet cover from Swinton Taxi Division


We go the extra mile to get you cheaper insurance


Mick, Lyndy and Paul head up our dedicated fleet team, and they can get you a great price on your fleet cover… but they don’t stop there. They’ve got over 50 years experience of working with taxi fleets between them and they know what they’re talking about. Don’t arrange your fleet cover until you’ve spoken to them.


The Swinton Fleet Team can arrange: • Public liability cover


• A great quote by searching a panel of insurers


• Flexible payments • Tailored cover


Yasser Mansha, Albatross Cars, Derby “ Being with Swinton


Taxi Division has allowed us to cut our costs and invest this money back into our business. We’ve saved thousands!


For fleet queries only call today on or go online to www.swintontaxi.co.uk For single vehicle queries call 0800 409 6498


NOVEMBER 2011 PHTM 0800 531 6125


Swinton Taxi Division is a division of Swinton Group Limited, registered in England number 756681, which is connected for the purposes of the Insurance Companies Regulations 1994 to MMA Insurance plc and Gateway Insurance Company Limited. Registered office: Swinton House, 6 Great Marlborough Street, Manchester M1 5SW. Calls may be recorded. Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority.


PAGE 9





Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88