search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PROTEST PLIGHT


TAXI DRIVERS ACROSS WEST NORTHANTS SUBJECT TO NEW RULES DESPITE PROTESTS


Taxi drivers across West North- amptonshire will be subjected to a new set of rules, despite objections from the trade. Hundreds of angry drivers took to the streets of Northampton on Tuesday evening, 9 January,


to


protest the council’s policy outside the licensing committee meeting. A council committee reconvened as the initial proposal in October was deferred after drivers’ union ADCU protested in October last year when the taxi policy first went to


the council. Committee


members have now had more time to consider the consultation response from the trade. Cllr Gareth Eales, a member of the licensing committee, described the previous meeting as “somewhat of a spiky affair” after the ADCU accused the council of “racist” and “regressive” regulations. One of the proposals that has been highly contended by drivers but has now been given the go-ahead is a penalty


points system


designed to record rule breaks and misconduct from drivers. Where a complaint is made from the public an investigation will then determine whether any action is taken and if points are imposed. If a driver has accrued more than 12 penalty points over 12 months, their licence may be revoked or suspended with immediate effect.


Mohamed Dogan, a taxi driver at the protest, said that he was “extremely worried” about the implications of the new regulations and felt that the points system was the “biggest issue”. He added: “We have to be careful


16


all the time. I have a family to support - I’ve been doing taxi driving for 18 years and we never had a problem. This policy is created to penalise us.” Breaches include failure to comply with the dress code; not offering reasonable assistance


with


luggage; turning up late to a booking without proper reason and allowing noise from a radio or other equipment to be a “nuisance or annoyance”. Cllr Eales told the meeting that the points system was actually an “upgrade” from the previous rules. He argued that there is a right to appeal at every step if a complaint is lodged, however under the old Northampton Borough policy the first time there would be an opportunity for the warning to be challenged would be “when they’re in front of a sub-committee with their licence under review”. Other amendments to the policy include a “certificate of good conduct” whereby all drivers must provide documents from every country they have lived in for more than six months. Changes to


requirements, for


example proper signage on vehicles and more training to be undertaken by drivers, will be given a period of grace to complete.


Existing licensed vehicles that don’t stack up to the new standards will also be granted ‘grandfather’ rights until a new one is purchased. The policy will be kept under constant review to ensure it remains fit for purpose- quarterly meetings with the taxi and private hire vehicles trade are also to be reintroduced to “rebuild working relations” and address any con- cerns with the implemenation. Northampton chair of the ADCU, Shafqat Shah previously warned that drivers would be forced to hold strikes if the draft policy was enforced. He said the union had been “held to ransom” by the council and that drivers were being “unfairly targeted”. He asked: “Where is any kind of protection in this policy that actually relates to the poor driver doing this job? Drivers are very angry - at the end of the day, it’s our livelihoods we need to protect.” He added that he foresees a lot of drivers leaving the industry if nothing is changed. The ADCU says it is consulting drivers on whether they want to take industrial action. The council wrote that the new systems were seen as an “open and transparent way” of dealing with licensing issues and that ultimately each case would be dealt with “on its own merit”. It insisted that the policy was not “designed or intended to be punitive” and the main aim is to “improve safety” and provide the “best possible service to the public”. The policy is due to take effect from 1 April.


FEBRUARY 2024 PHTM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76