search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BRIGHTON: IDLING ENGINE FINE COMES IN


ROUND THE COUNCILS NEW FOREST:


LICENSING FEES/POLICY CONSULTATION


Drivers have slammed a new rule meaning they could be fined for leaving their engine running while parked as “anti-motorist”. The measure, brought in by Brighton and Hove City Council on Tuesday January 2, means motorists must now turn off their engine while in a parking bay, taxi rank and other parts of the road or they could face a £40 fine. The council disputes claims the scheme is anti- motorist and said it is instead an anti-pollution measure. The council added that an idling engine can produce up to twice as many exhaust emissions as an engine in motion. The crackdown will not apply to stationary vehicles sitting in traffic. Concerns have been raised about circumstances where leaving an engine on might be unavoidable, including when deicing a car, or in a health emergency. The highway code states that “windscreens and windows must be kept clean and free from obstructions to vision” and some drivers raised concerns about how they might start their cars on frosty mornings and allow heaters to demist their windows. Brighton Council has since confirmed that drivers will not be fined in this instance. A council spokesman said: “Our enforcement team asks drivers with idling engines to switch the engine off. We only fine people who refuse to do so. “There are also a number of scenarios where we would not issue fines.”These include: • To a vehicle when demisting its windscreen • To elderly or vulnerable people who need the engine to be on for heating or cooling purposes


• To a vehicle which requires the engine of their vehicle running for refrigeration purposes


• To a vehicle broken down and awaiting recovery or if the engine must be on for diagnostic purposes


• To emergency service vehicles Chairman of the city council’s transport committee, Cllr Trevor Muten, said: “Enforcing engine idling is something we hope will deter motorists from releasing harmful emissions unnecessarily. We’re asking those parked up to switch off their engines and reduce air pollution. “It’s about reminding motorists to be considerate of their environment and to do their bit for other people – particularly children, the elderly and the vulnerable.” For an update on this situation see Brighton & Hove Cab Trade View on pages 64-65 where Andrew Peters details how the council has been enforcing this policy.


PHTM FEBRUARY 2024


New Forest DC states: “As part of our draft budget for 2024/25, we are proposing to increase taxi and private hire licence fees to reflect the increased work and costs from implementing national changes in government guidance that we must follow. “This includes new HMRC tax conditionality checks, statutory guidance requirements produced by the DfT, and increased driver DBS checks. “This is the first proposed increase to fees since 2017.” The proposed fees can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/33krbbj5 Responses must be received by midnight on Thursday 8 February 2024. The Taxi and Private Hire Policy consultation can be found here: http://tinyurl.com/mvym37x2 Responses must be submitted before midnight on Friday 15 March 2024.


EAST SUFFOLK: CHANGE TO ‘UNFIT TAXI’ LOOPHOLE


A new policy targeting a loophole allowing unfit taxi drivers to re-apply for a licence has been approved. On 15 January members of East Suffolk’s licensing committee unanimously agreed to approve a policy which changed the council’s hackney carriage and private hire licensing policy. The change happened after councillors were told of unfit taxi drivers who tried to exploit a loophole and attempted to get a new licence. They heard, for instance, of a recent taxi driver who, after they had been found unfit to hold a licence, missed their deadline for an appeal and instead contacted the licensing team to apply again. Cllr Jan Candy, cabinet member for community health, said: “It’s not a good use of time and resources to allow reapplications from applicants who have already been found to be unfit.” Under the new policy, those who are found unfit will not be able to apply for another licence within 12 months of the decision, unless there are substantial and proven material circumstances to the applicant’s circumstances. The council report also read: “In setting out its policy, the council seeks to promote the protection and safety of the public, safeguarding children and the vulnerable.”


13


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76