differentpartofyourselfthatyoudon’t necessarilyhaveintheoffice’.Whilefor another, the evening commute on the train is where she transitioned from ‘workself’to‘homeself’.Andthistran- sitionaffectedthenatureoftheinterac- tions and the stories exchanged with the colleagues that travelled with her. But the most consistent theme was that of blurred ownership. A number ofthespaceswerenot‘owned’byany particular group. They were neutral spaces, often on the border between differentteams.Participantsspoke about kitchen areas as places where you couldmeetanyonefromtheoffice—a space for ‘gatherings and paths cross- ing’.Theencountersherewereoften serendipitous — the changing room, the toilets,smokers’corner,thecaféwhere you‘bumped’intopeople.Andthereisa long thread of research that recognises such random encounters as valuable for transmitting ideas and stimulating crea- tivity — especially where these ‘inciden- talinformationexchanges’occuracross diverse groups. So, space, particularly liminal space, seemed to play a key role in stimulating the interactions that lead to storytelling. But then, for many, the pandemic com- pletely transformed the spaces where we worked.
A twist in the tale
Back in the summer of 2020, as I studiedmyparticipants’photographs (which,duetotheUniversity’sethical researchrequirements,wereabsent of people), they struck me as an eerie, unsettling portent of what was to come. Ourvibrantofficespaces,fullofsocial interaction and congregation, now empty anddenudedoflife.Consequently,I begantoreflectonwhatwashappening toorganisationalstoriesnowweweren’t, physically, in the organisation. Had they migrated to new spaces — the virtual spaces of Zoom, Teams, instant messag- ing and email? Or were stories, deprived of their natural habitat, now faced with potential extinction?
The early signs were not encourag-
ing.FromtheworkshopsIranwithin Linklaters, with clients and at various conferences, a recurring topic was the struggle to replicate virtually random, unplanned encounters. And this was experienced as a loss — a sentiment echoed by then Chief Economist at the Bank of England, Andy Haldane who, in his Autumn 2020 speech, cited serendip- ityasthe‘cradleofcreativity’2
. A similar
themewasthatof‘informationfriction’ — denied the rich data we gain from face- to-face interactions, people talked about operatinginavacuumandconsequently misreadingsituations.Somewerefinding itmoredifficult‘togetthingsofftheir chest’,toretainasenseofproportion.
January-February 2022
So,perhapswhatsomeofuswerefind- ing challenging about working remotely —what we missed about the buildings we had relocated from — was our separation from those liminal storytelling spaces?
The final chapter…? Forthenextstageofmyresearch,Iwill return to my two research sites and ask what actually happened to the spaces of storytelling during lockdown? And how might these habitats change in a new world of hybrid working? I believe these areimportantquestions.Myresearchto datehasconfirmedthatstorytellingisa valuable activity — and that the spaces in whichitoccursmattertoo.Thefindings haveconsequencesforanyoneworkingin organisations and, in particular, to those of us involved in knowledge manage- ment. The 2018 International Standard on knowledge management systems (ISO30401)suggeststhatnotonlydo stories and conversations form part of the ‘KnowledgeSpectrum’butthatKM‘focuses on managing the working environment, thusnurturingtheknowledgelifecycle’3
. I
suggest the research to date has demon- stratedthattheterm‘environment’ should not be considered metaphorically but, instead, grounded in the material, physical world. Butwillthepandemic—anditseffect on where we work — mean that storytell- ing environments become increasingly virtual? And how might an appreciation of the role of liminal space in storytelling influencethevirtualspaceswecreate? How can we best introduce serendipity, unplanned interactions between diverse groups or the creation of spaces where hierarchy dissolves? Or, to take a more pessimistic stance, will the predicted flightfromofficestoremoteandhybrid working signal the decline of storytelling and,worryingly,thebenefitsitgivesusall. Are stories now a threatened species in the changing habitats of organisational life? Watch out for the next episode in this particular story.
Would you like to be part of the story? I’malwaysfascinatedtohearaboutthe places in which people hear stories in their organisations. So, if you have ideas and views to share, please do contact me at ian.
rodwell@city.ac.uk or
ian.rodwell@
linklaters.com. Where did you hear stories before Covid — and where do you hear stories now? IP
l For those interested in liminal spaces, find out more via my blog:
www.liminalnarratives.com
References
1 See for example, Turner, V. (1969) The ritual process: structure and anti-structure. New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.
2 Haldane, A. (2020) ‘Is home working good for you?’ Available at:
www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/ speech/2020/is-home-working- good-for-you-speech-by-andy- haldane. pdf?la=en&hash=099975AB9B41135F1DC132D90C5466DDD4598218 (Accessed: 31 October 2020).
3 International Organization for Standardization (2018) ISO 3041:2018(E) Knowledge management systems — require- ments. Geneva: ISO.
p.vi
Auvinen, T., Aaltio, I. and Blomqvist, K. (2013) ‘Construct- ing leadership by storytelling — the meaning of trust and narratives’, Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(6), pp. 496–514.
Fayard, A-L. and Weeks, J. (2007) ‘Photocopiers and water-coolers: the affordances of informal interaction’, Organization Studies, 28(5), pp. 605–634.
Fletcher, C. (1996) “’The 250lb man in an alley”: police storytelling’, Journal of Organizational Change Manage- ment, 9(5), pp. 36-42.
Fotaki, M., Altman, Y. and Koning, J. ‘Spirituality, symbol- ism and storytelling in twenty-first century organizations: understanding and addressing the crisis of imagination’, Organization Studies, 41(1), 7-30.
Humphreys, M., Ucbasaran, D. and Lockett, A. (2012) ‘Sensemaking and sensegiving stories of jazz leadership’, Human Relations, 65(1), pp. 41-62.
Patriotta, G. (2003) ‘Sensemaking on the shop floor’, Journal of Management Studies, 40, pp. 349-375.
Smith, R., Pedersen, S. and Burnett, S. (2014) ‘Towards an organizational folklore of policing: the storied nature of policing and the policy use of storytelling’, Folklore 125(2), pp. 218-237.
Snowden, D. (1999) ‘Storytelling: an old skill in a new con- text’, Business Information Review, 16(1), pp. 30-37.
Swap, W., Leonard, D., Shields, M. and Abrams, L. (2001) ‘Using mentoring and storytelling to transfer knowledge in the workplace’, Management Information Systems, 18(1), pp. 95–114.
Tangherlini, T.R. (2000) ‘Heroes and lies: storytelling tactics among paramedics’, Folklore, 111, pp. 43-66.
Van Gennep, A. (1960[1909]) The rites of passage. Trans- lated by M.K. Vizedom and G.L. Caffee. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Van Hulst, M. (2017) ‘Backstage storytelling and leader- ship’, Policing, 20(5), pp. 1045-1064.
Van Hulst, M. and Ybema, S. (2020) ‘From what to where: a setting-sensitive approach to organizational storytelling’, Organization Studies, 41(3), pp. 365-391.
INFORMATION PROFESSIONAL 31
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60