in letters of advice, research notes and specimenclauses.Andthisuncodified, narrative knowledge was unlikely to be capturedinformal‘know-how’systems. Perhaps here the role of knowledge management was to encourage conversa- tions(andhencestories)andfindwaysto evolve the environments — the organi- sational‘eco-systems’—thatactasthe natural habitats for such conversations? Formyinitial,doctoralresearchI workedwithtwoorganisations:alawfirm and a professional institute. I selected a small group of participants at each and askedthemtotakephotographsofthefive organisational spaces where they heard the most interesting, meaningful and memo- rable stories. Importantly, I stressed that as our interactions with colleagues are not alwaysconfinedtothebuildingsinwhich we work, these might not necessarily be in theoffice.Ithenusedthephotographsas the basis for a semi-structured interview with each participant. So,whatdidIfind?
The plot thickens Theparticipantsconfirmedthatstory- telling was a valuable activity and they identifiedarangeofdifferentstories: problem stories, frustration stories, warn- ing stories, solution stories and, even, ghost stories! And the work these stories performedwasequallyvarious.They assistedthediffusionoforganisational culture;helpedpeople‘getthingsofftheir chest’;and,mostcommonly,enabled the exchange of information and knowl- edge.Butthiswasn’tjustwork-related knowledge. Perhaps the most commonly citedbenefitwasthewaystoriessurfaced personal knowledge about people (their family lives, challenges, fears, ambitions). In these cases, the story became the storyteller.
Now, our reaction to this might be ‘so what?’Surelythisismerelyinsignificant gossip? My participants proposed an alternative view. They argued that such stories‘cementthatrelationship’helping you‘feelmoreateasewitheachother’. Andthis‘roundedpicture’ofcolleagues could enhance team performance. Or as one participant put it: ‘we work well togetherbecauseweknoweachother’. Consequently,Iwouldarguethatsuch knowledge carries a high organisational currency. And the stories that transmit it realiseconsiderablesocial,affectiveand cognitivebenefits.Theycomprisethe socialglue,the‘connectivetissue’,that enables us all to collaborate and work moreeffectively.
So where were these stories told? The photographs I received depicted recep- tions, kitchen areas, changing rooms, toilets,
acolleague’sBBQparty,pubs, workcafés,smokers’corner,‘petwall’, 30 INFORMATION PROFESSIONAL January-February 2022
when applying the term to the middle stage of a rite of passage. As a ‘betwixt andbetween’phaseitisambiguous and paradoxical. Think about how you felt when you started a new job or role (often cited as a liminal experience). Did you feel confused, anxious and uncertain as well as simultaneously energised and excited by the possibil- ities and opportunities ahead? If so, welcome to the world of liminality. VanGennep’sworkwasdevelopedby a later anthropologist, Victor Turner, inaseriesofstudiesbetweenthe1960s and 1980s1
. The concept of liminality
hassubsequentlybeenappliedacrossa range of academic disciplines — includ- ing literary criticism, sociology, psy- chology, political science and business management.
homeoffices,musicrooms,carparks,the train home and the street outside. These were not the grand spaces we usually associate with organisations. Rather, these bore all the characteristics of liminal spaces.Perhapsit’sworthpausinghere toreflectontheterm‘liminal’—akey character in my research story.
Enter a new character Theword‘liminality’derivesfromthe Latin term, limen (a threshold). It there- fore implies a margin or edge between two states or spaces and the possibility of transition between the two. It is this sense that anthropologist Arnold van Gennep (vanGennep,1960[1909]referenced
But you may wonder what has this to do with space? Well, the term ‘limi- nal’hasbeenattributedtoarangeof locations —urban wastelands, hotels, beaches, prison waiting rooms, motor- way service stations — along with more prosaic organisational settings: corri- dors,fireescapes,bathrooms.Theseare mundane, marginal and border spaces where things are easily blurred. Andthisthemeof‘blurring’cameout loud and clear in the research. Several participants noted how these spaces, for example the gym changing room, blurred distinctions and hierarchies. These were places where anyone spoke with anyone — resulting in conver- sations that might not have occurred elsewhere (and one feature of liminal spaces in rites of passage is communitas — the fostering of social connections andsupportwithinagroupofequals). Others noted how these storytelling spacesalsoblurredidentities.Forone participant,‘crossingathreshold’and leavingthebuildingtogotosmokers’ corner enabled her to ‘switch on a
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60