search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
THE GREAT DISCONNECT report


Recent research explores the maritime industry’s relationship with cyber security risks and makes recommendations to shipowners and operators to improve how those risks are managed within their organisations.


CONSULTING


THE GREAT DISCONNECT


The state of cyber risk management in the maritime industry


Key finding: shipowners pay an average of $3.1 million in ransoms due to cyber attacks


The Great Disconnect report is a collaboration between produced by maritime cyber security company CyberOwl, maritime innovation agency Thetius and law firm HFW. After taking into account the views of more than 200 industry professionals through a combination of an industry survey and research interviews conducted with cyber security experts and stakeholders, the report attempts to shed light on the cyber security readiness of shipping.


SURVEY RESULTS AND SUMMARY OF KEY FINDINGS


Nick Chubb, Patrick Finn & Daniel Ng


Foreword by Guy Platten, Secretary General of the International Chamber of Shipping


16.1% SEAFARER


41.1%


ASHORE FOR INDUSTRY SUPPLIER


42.7%


ASHORE FOR SHIPPING COMPANY


36%


of industry professionals believe their organisation has been the victim of a cyber attack in the last three years.


73%


of respondents believe their organisation has a cyber security incident response plan.


BREAKDOWN BY SENIORITY ASHORE:


44% OF


EMPLOYEES IN OPERATIONAL ROLES


37% OF EMPLOYEES IN


MANAGEMENT ROLES


19% OF EMPLOYEES IN


LEADERSHIP ROLES 3%


BREAKDOWN BY DEMOGRAPHIC:


90% OF 71% OF SHORESIDE


PERSONNEL AT SHIPPING COMPANIES


SEAFARERS


55% OF INDUSTRY 61% OF SENIOR


SUPPLIERS LEADERS


52% 34%


of industry professionals believe their organisation has a process in place for gathering intelligence on cyber security threats.


of cyber attacks resulted in the respondents’ organisation


paying a ransom. $3.1 MILLION


...Is the average ransom paid


of industry professionals believe their organisation has insurance in place to cover cyber attacks.


Image credit: CyberOwl, Thetius, HFW 50 | The Report • June 2022 • Issue 100


However, the authors note that maritime has still a lot to do in order to be better protected from cyber-attacks, and for this reason it presented a 4-point plan for the industry to follow in order to enhance its cyber resilience.


Speaking at the launch of the Great Disconnect report, Chris Bhatt, Chief Commercial Officer, Aon explained that “shipping is not taking responsibility, as it passes it all to IT, saying it is their job.” For this reason, he suggests for maritime to spend money to assess vulnerabilities and find potential risk points.


Agreeing with Mr. Bhatt, Ronald Spithout, an industry expert in maritime digitalisation, added that, “As of now shipping has taken half measures regarding cyber security, in order to be compliant. However, these measures are not enough to really protect itself.”


According to the Great Disconnect report, within maritime organisations, there is a disconnect between the perceived and actual readiness to respond to an attack. Whether at sea or ashore, the more senior a member of staff is, the less likely they are to know if their organisation has suffered from a cyber-attack.


In fact, at sea, 26% of seafarers do not know what actions are required of them during a cyber security incident, and 32% do not conduct any regular cyber security drills


192 RESPONDENTS


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136