search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Initial Trial Findings - Impact


• As stated, the standard way for a vessel to get nitrogen out of a special product tank after the discharge of Methanol has been to entirely fill the tank with fresh water. This procedure dispels the nitrogen as the tank fills. When the tank is then emptied, the atmosphere returns to a safe working standard with normal oxygen levels. The main issue with this procedure is that it creates a lot of waste washings for waste disposal, and therefore extremely large disposal costs and negative environmental impact for the client. The special product tanks on the trial vessel were 146m3 each. Instead of using 146m3 of fresh water to fill the tank, after collaboration with The Methanol Institution UK, we implemented the use of only 10m3 of water in order to reach a safe dilution level. A huge saving of waste washings, environmental impact, and disposal costs.


• Reducing the waste disposal by 136m3 – huge environmental saving, huge client cost reduction. • We then utilised a specialist piece of quayside machinery to return the tank to normal working atmosphere.


• Time taken to return the tank atmosphere to ‘gas free’ status and fit for entry by utilizing the quayside equipment was less than 50 minutes. (The time to discharge 146m3 of waste flushings would be approximately 2-3 hours, so large time savings also).


• The entire operation ran safely, smoothly, and efficiently from start to finish.


We have now rolled out our innovation to all clients in the North Sea and our procedures have been accepted as industry standard, with savings of 3,477 tonnes of waste over the past 12 months alone. The vast reductions of waste production also lead to a reduction of road tankers on the road transferring waste, contributing to carbon footprint improvements, and a large decrease in pumping time which in turn improves vessel turnaround time and the eradication of vessels having to be on specific berths to discharge waste. We have an extremely detailed tracking system in place which documents every aspect of every job we oversee; these documents and key performance indicators are used


to create performance and savings reports for our clients. In 2021 we saved one of our clients 3,477 tonnes of waste creation, and in the process saved them £173,859 in disposal costs. The importance of environmental protection cannot be understated, and we have come to understand that our clients look to us to not only ensure operations on the quayside are efficient and safe, but we can introduce factors which guarantee that the impact of certain operations are as environmentally friendly as possible.


In addition to the vast savings we have created, the new process has meant that our clients no longer have to move their large supply vessels to


104 | The Report • June 2022 • Issue 100


a designated waste (berth) facility to pump large volumes of waste to shore tanks to then in turn be removed by road tankers for processing at shore plants. This saves a lot of time both in the pumping process and movement around the harbour which can at times by extremely busy, waiting times for harbour movement can run into several hours. The vessels instead can discharge a far smaller volume directly to the road tankers and clean the tanks as a continuous operation on the same berth reducing vessel turnaround times.


The feedback we have received since we created our procedures have been extremely positive, see below examples:


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136