search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Over my


brief career of eleven years, I have talked to numerous boat builders and


students, wanting to become marine surveyors. The most detrimental point, is the future likelihood of being taken to court.


block. My first reaction was fear, stomach cramps, and a complete loss of sleep. But the goal of this article is to explain how I worked through the process so others can deal with the process as well.


Basically, the owner was taking myself, the broker, and the brokerage company, to court for $30,000. Probably not a lot in the big scheme of things, but still not pleasant. His claim was that he had bought the boat from my survey, the engine had failed, the boat had flooded, and now there was structural damage. Initially he wanted full costs of the vessel, but changed for a lesser amount as he did not want to go to a higher court.


The first thing I did was contact my insurance company. To this day, I cannot fault in any way, their professionalism, and willingness to help. They immediately assigned two in-house lawyers to my case. This alone, proves that insurance premiums are well worth their value. It is good to have someone watching your back.


The two main arguments forwarded by myself were a), the vessel was sold


six months after I actually surveyed it and b), the vessels owner was not my original client, and had obtained my survey from the broker illegally.


So then began the home work. I went over my own survey with a fine-tooth comb, looking for any faults which could trip me up. I then managed to get all invoices and documentation for the vessel with repairs undertaken since the incident. I also found that during delivery, on a truck for 600 kilometres, the vessel had filled up with rain water. This because I tracked down the cartage contractor and interviewed him. Further investigation also found that the owner had been warned not to use the vessel until, the engine had been checked and serviced because of water immersion. He decided to ignore all advice and proceeded to use the vessel, and get in trouble.


I also researched his expert witness, his qualifications, which were minimal, his quoting process, and his personal friendship with the vessel owner. By researching his business, which was not registered, his home location, and his socio-economic situation, I felt I had covered all bases.


Obviously, the most important point to me, was the brokers use of my survey. Before the trial started, the brokerage company contacted myself, and asked if I would work with them against the vessel owner. As soon as I replied in the negative, all relationships and communications shut down.


By now several months had passed and I had gathered together substantial evidence. The unfortunate thing, when a surveyor first encounters this situation, a lot of sleepless nights are the result, and slowly the business starts to suffer. I was completely obsessed with the case day and night, and still feel sorry for friends and family who had to deal with my thoughts.


Finally, I had all of my documentation secure and went to the insurance company office. They had a court judge assess my findings, sign and signature all of my paper work, and rubber stamp the documents as ready for use. I then asked the court register to not be present at the trial, as the travel distance was too great, but to be at a phone conference. This was accepted.


The Report • June 2022 • Issue 100 | 47


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136