search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
COMMENT IN MY OPINION


How many people were as horrified as I was to see reports last week


suggesting ‘a third of UK travel agents could go out of business by 2021’? For those who didn’t, a number of media articles followed a report commissioned by Radio 4’s consumer programme You & Yours. The BBC programme had asked the insolvency firm Opus Restructuring to analyse data from financial risk advisors Company Watch, which looked at the finances of almost 4,000 travel firms. The findings were that as many as 33% of the 2,584 travel agents analysed, and 29% of the 1,325 tour operators, were in danger of folding within three years. Well, that’s helpful!


Unfair reflection Please don’t get me wrong: I’m not saying that this report has been fabricated. I suspect it cost a lot of money and took time to conduct. But what I am sure of is that it is


not reflective of our industry – our fabulous, resilient, ever-evolving and forward-thinking industry – as a whole. Thankfully, Abta was asked for its


comment, and was as disbelieving of the so-called ‘facts’ as I am. According to the study, 15% of


travel companies are ‘zombies’ (with balance sheets negative by £5,000 or more) and 25% of travel agents had total assets of £25,000 or less. These and other chunky statistics had the travelling public worried that their hard-earned cash would not be safe when booking through a travel agent. We all know this is totally untrue.


Radio 4 was on the wrong wavelength with agent-bashing


Station’s analysis of ‘at risk’ travel firms was sensationalist and unfair


GEMMA ANTROBUS


CHAIRMAN, AITO SPECIALIST TRAVEL AGENTS


What the study failed to understand,


or report, is that the majority of travel business transacted in the UK is done through fully bonded and licensed travel companies, which meet strict regulations to trade. We do this so that our clients’ funds are never affected should any element of the booking fail. Some of us operate trust accounts; some have large bonds in the bank or similar. It all means the same thing: clients’ money is protected. Why was that not mentioned?


Positive message What was reported, however, was that “this is an industry with a clear lack of financial substance”. A message like this will only push the consumer away from the fully bonded and safer way of booking holidays and lead them to believe that they will be better off booking individual elements themselves. And we all know where that can lead. Speaking only on behalf of Aito Specialist Travel Agents, in the nearly 30


years since Aito Agents began, not a single independent agency member of ours has become insolvent. How about using that as a headline instead! To add to this, Aito’s recent Travel Insights report surveyed over 22,000 consumers (via Aito’s travel agent and operator members) and a staggering 91% stated they would take the same number of holidays or more in 2019 – that’s a really strong and positive message for our industry. Back to the Radio 4 report. As


frustrating as distorted news like this is, we won’t let it beat us. I believe 2019 is the year of resilience and the year in which we pull together and prove that the very best way to book your travel is via fully bonded and protected travel companies. We’ve proved it before, and we will prove it again.


MORE COLUMNS BY GEMMA ANTROBUS: GO.TRAVELWEEKLY.CO.UK/COMMENT


30travelweekly.co.uk31 January 2019


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122