search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUSINESS NEWS


BA’s Heathrow-New York restart flight takes off on Monday. The carrier says the flight was 35% powered by SAF but the Aviation Environment Federation describes waste-based fuels as a ‘dead end for aviation decarbonisation’


BA returns to New York but fuel claims disputed


Aviation body questions merits of sustainable aviation fuel. Ian Taylor reports


British Airways operated its first flight to New York as the US reopened on Monday powered by 35% sustainable aviation fuel, the highest proportion of SAF yet used for a commercial transatlantic flight. BA argued the fuel, made from


used cooking oil and mixed with 65% kerosene, “reduces lifecycle CO2 emissions by more than 80% compared to the traditional jet fuel it replaces”. The flight operated as the Cop26


climate conference continued in Glasgow and after BA parent IAG


80 11 NOVEMBER 2021


recently committed to operating 10% of flights using SAF by 2030. However, the Aviation Environment


Federation (AEF), disputed the 80% emissions reduction claim, insisting: “Waste-based fuels are a dead end when it comes to aviation decarbonisation.” The AEF said: “At best, waste-based


fuels offer a ‘net’ not an ‘actual’ emissions reduction. At least as much CO2 is emitted when they are burned as from kerosene, so any emissions saving comes from the assumption that CO2 has been absorbed historically by the organic matter in


the waste. Using waste fuels does not cut CO2 emissions now.” It added: “Many claims of big


emissions savings from these fuels arise from assumptions that they avoid the release of methane generated by food waste in landfill. But converting these wastes into aviation fuel isn’t a net-zero strategy given the CO2 it releases. This isn’t a scalable solution for powering aviation.” AEF is a UK-based NGO whose


Continued on page 78 travelweekly.co.uk


BUSINESSNEWS


PICTURE: Doug Peters/PA Wire


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84