search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
FRONTLINE


DAVID WALKER aka The Travel Snob, homeworker based in Nottingham and Not Just Travel member


So, back to the lifestyles of the rich


and famous. Well, I say famous – these days they think they’re famous if they have more than 1,000 followers on Instagram. Recently, I had a panicked phone call from a parent requiring a hotel “immediately” as their 18-year-old son was on a yacht and had decided he didn’t like it. Really? Who doesn’t like sailing around the Balearics on a 65ft superyacht? Never mind. One £700-a-night room later and Little Lord Muck is safely back on dry land. Another request came from a mum and dad, answering to all their son’s needs. I’d already booked the three of them on a Seabourn cruise over Christmas and New Year, with first-class flights and hotel suites. Now their lad decided he might get bored and wanted to take a friend. After I told them that would be an additional £11,000, they said that was fine and “he’ll be happy”. He’s 17.


THE ROLEX FACTOR Last year, they took him to New York in first class and stayed at the Mandarin Oriental – all because they wanted to buy him a Rolex. Have they not heard of Amazon? And that’s not all. The same


‘child’ gets treated to five of his mates being flown out to the villa they rent every year in Portugal for


38 11 JULY 2019 AGENT


Lord Muck, 18, and Princess Ruby, 8 – catering for rich kids is another world


£16,000 per week. They take it for three weeks, with ‘family weeks’ for the three of them either side of the boys’ retreat week.


I sometimes wonder how much our clients’ children influence where they take their holidays. We all have clients that demand kids’ clubs. Some, although they may not admit it, request it so they can dump their children the second they arrive in resort (and, in an ideal world, pick them up at reception on the day of the flight home). Others, on the flip side, want a host of activities that they can do together as a family, like cycling, sailing, tennis and football. As agents, we all know where to send


them when we know their needs. I have one family that will only stay in a hotel where there are kids. They have an eight-year-old princess and request spa treatments, childs’ slippers and robes. Princess Ruby now refuses to fly anything other than first unless it’s Virgin, as she likes the bar area. Really?


ON THIN ICE For the smaller children, when we speak about Lapland, how many of us agents tell families the kids will love it? We should, of course, be adding “but you will hate it!” Alas, the parents go, and we all dread that returned-home call. We always start it the same way. “Didn’t the kids just love it?” Then we hold the phone as far away as possible... I’m sure many agents will sympathise with me. Many of us will have given families what we feel is the perfect holiday proposal, only to be told that Tarquin and Farquin don’t like it and “do we have any other options?”


Or do they use their children as an excuse? Maybe we should just speak to the children when discussing their next holiday plans.


HEARD ABOUT MY CLIENT SLUMMING IT ON A £37K TRIP?


E


GOING ‘CHEAP’ Did I tell you about the clients who were looking for a “cheap” Easter break? Bear in mind, their cheap is very different to mine. So I gave her some options: Sandy Lane, for £57,000, and Four Seasons Bahamas, for £47,000. However, in the end she plumped for Fairmont Barbados, a snippet at £37,000. How tight are some people?


E PISA THE ACTION


We flew to Pisa last weekend on Ryanair (I know, I know). We decided not to go


Priority, and were glad we didn’t: we got on quicker than anyone else. It seems everyone now books Priority just to get the extra case on the flight, but ‘priority’ it does not give you. We’d forgotten we couldn’t take bags on board; however, no one stopped us and we got on quicker. The moral of the story? Go figure!


travelweekly.co.uk


David


Sharon Colin Kim Sa diary


Sarah


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68