search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
The Unmaking of EXORCIST II THE HERETIC By Paul Talbot Among the most anticipated movies scheduled for the summer of 1977 was John Boorman’s EXORCIST II: THE HERETIC. But, by the end of that season, disgruntled audience members and angry theater owners would know that sequel as one of the


biggest disappointments of the decade. THE EXORCIST—which told the story of a demon-possessed little girl and her salvation by a pair of Catholic priests—became a cultural phenomenon when it was released in late 1973. It stunned audiences and collected $72 million at US theaters, making it the highest- grossing movie of all time. (JAWS surpassed it in 1975.) Sequels were becoming fashionable and profitable—THE GODFATHER PART II, THE TRIAL OF BILLY JACK, AIRPORT 1975 and FUNNY LADY were recent blockbusters—and Warner Bros. announced in August 1975 that they were actively developing THE EXORCIST PART II. After original EXORCIST writer/producer William Peter Blatty and director William Friedkin passed on the follow-up, the studio hired New York playwright William Goodhart (GENERATION), who came up with a strange, metaphysical two-page treatment entitled THE HERETIC. Warners had originally wanted a low- budget ($3 million) schlock-horror cash-in and had offered the sequel to editor-turned-director Sam O’Steen (SPARKLE), but studio executive John Calley was impressed with Goodhart’s ambitious premise and saw the sequel as a potential blockbuster from a major director. The treatment was sent to Oscar-nominee John Boorman (POINT BLANK, DELIVERANCE). Boorman told the press at the time: “I had been involved slightly, back before THE EXORCIST was made. John Calley gave me [Blatty’s] book and asked if I wanted to make the film. I turned it down because I thought that, as a film, it would be rather repulsive, and I was horrified with the idea of the possessed child... I told Calley, ‘Not only will I not make this movie, but I don’t want you to make it, either.’”


19

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84