Lube-Tech PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE
mandatory consumer instructions for correct disposal and container design to minimise spillage [9]. This elaborate and multifaceted criterion reflects the environmental approach that considers not only lubricant performance, but also feedstock production and waste management.
In the United States, the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) regulations for marine lubricants establish stringent laws for vessels present in U.S. waters. The Vessel General Permit program mandates the use of “Environmentally Acceptable Lubricants (EALs) for all applications where lubricants are likely to have contact with the water, including stern tube bearings, hydraulic systems, thrusters, and stabilisers [10]. In terms of EPA standards, lubricants must possess three properties: ready biodegradability, defined as greater than 60% biodegradation within 28 days using OECD 301 test methods; low aquatic toxicity, established through LC50 testing on algae, daphnia, and fishing using OECD 201-203 methods; and non-bioaccumulative characteristics, which is demonstrated through log Kow values less than 3 or bioconcentration factors lower than 100 L/kg [10].
The environmental significance of these marine lubricant regulations becomes more apparent when considering the magnitude of operational mishaps dealing with lubricants. The EPA estimates that commercial vessels make over 1.7 million port visits annually worldwide, during which stern tube leakage alone releases 4.6 to 28.6 million liters of lubricating oil [10]. Combined with additional discharges from deck machinery and equipment underwater, total annual inputs of lubricating oil to marine port waters reach 36.9 to 61 million liters [10]. The estimated annual damage and response costs associated with this statistic amounts to about $322 million globally, with $31 million attributable to U.S. waters alone [10]. By mandating these applications, these policies directly attempt to address oil and lubricant aquatic damages.
38 LUBE MAGAZINE NO.191 FEBRUARY 2026 Conclusion
The genomics to tribology framework marks a fundamental shift in biolubricant development, aiming to replace post-farm chemical modification with molecular design at the genetic level. By determining the lipid architectures that lead to superior tribological behavior (very long chain fatty acids, estolides, and wax esters) and engineering oilseed crops for direct production, this approach can overcome performance limitations that have been restricting bio-based lubricants.
In examination of the three molecular targets that cause improved tribology, the engineered oils show clear advantages. Lines with high-erucic lines demonstrate 20-30% less while improving oxidative stability and wear protection [7]. Revamped estolide pathways produce oils with three times less friction and better metal-to-surface oxidation resistance compared to castor oil [5, 6]. Lastly, wax ester-rich oils from modified crambe, for example, cut wear volume by 55% and maintain high thermal stability even at modest blends like 15% [8]. This remarkable scientific progress aligns with strong market and regulatory drivers. The bio-lubricants market is growing at 13.7% annually, outcompeting the 3.9% growth rate of petroleum lubricants, with North America paving the way with regulatory mandates and large market shares [2]. Following this are the other major regions, like Europe’s Ecolabel mandates, for renewable and environmentally acceptable lubricants [9, 10].
Ultimately, the genomics to tribology approach provides more than improved bio-lubricants. It establishes a theoretical framework for designing renewable substitutes to greenify industry operations which will immensely benefit the environment. As biological and tribological research progresses, most bio-based products might have more incentive for usage compared to the conventional but reliable petroleum-based materials.
No.162 page 8
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68
