search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Lube-Tech


a lubricant is measured in a Mini Traction Machine [7] as a function of the mean speed between the ball and disk. It should be noted that results of such experiments are typically plotted on a logarithmic scale, which gives the impression that boundary friction is much more important that it actually is. Figure 4 shows results plotted on both a logarithmic scale and on a linear scale.


PUBLISHED BY LUBE: THE EUROPEAN LUBRICANTS INDUSTRY MAGAZINE


No.152 page 3


As mentioned in the Introduction, the amount of mixed/boundary lubrication also depends critically on whether the components are brand new or have been allowed to “run-in”. Figure 5 shows the substantially greater amount of measured mixed/boundary friction of a new piston ring, compared to a “run-in” ring [8]. It has also been reported that the friction power loss of a new piston ring pack, compared to a “run-in” piston ring pack, is approximately 10-15% higher [9].


Figure 5: Measured friction force of new piston assembly compared to “run-in” piston assembly. Data replotted from reference [8].


Models for Mixed/Boundary Lubrication If W is the load applied to a lubricated contact, and it is assumed that a fraction of the load, WA, is carried by rough asperities, and the remaining fraction, WF, is carried by the fluid, then it is reasonable to assume that:


[2]


If the friction coefficients for the asperities and the fluid are fA and fF, and the overall friction coefficient is f, then the following equations result:


[3]


Figure 4: Typical friction measurements from laboratory tribological test equipment (in this case a Mini Traction Machine [7]). The graphs show the same data, although the upper graph uses a logarithmic horizontal scale, whereas the lower graph uses a linear horizontal scale.


If we write X = WA/W, then the above equation simplifies to become:


[4]


LUBE MAGAZINE NO.181 JUNE 2024


33


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68