search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Continued from page 47


When thread forming in the same material, the reduction of the average torque even exceeded 20% when comparing an optimised combination of sulphur carriers with a medium chain chlorinated paraffin with the same treat rate (figure 3).


Strip Drawing Test


The strip drawing test is commonly used to simulate the frictional conditions in deep drawing processes. In a test series which was carried out as a bachelor thesis at the Esslingen University of applied Sciences, a strip of DC04 deep drawing steel was drawn between drawing jaws that are pressed together with a surface pressure of 4N/mm² (figure 4). DC04 is a special grade cold rolled steel which is suitable for high deformation requirements. It is widely used for automotive parts like car body sheets for electric and ICE cars.


Figure 5: Strip drawing test results of drawing oil formulations containing chlorinated paraffin or sulphur carriers [2]


Figure 6: Recorded drawing forces for base oil, chlorinated paraffin and sulphur carrier based on triglyceride / olefin [2]


Figure 4: Strip drawing test rig at the Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, Faculty of Mechanical and Systems Engineering


The drawing speed in this test series was 6 m/minute and the applied lubricant mass was 1g/m² steel strip. The strip drawing test was performed with a medium chain chlorinated paraffin, containing 50% chlorine, with treat rates of 5, 10 and 20% [2] and with different sulphur carriers with only 5% treat rate. With 5% of an active sulphurised olefin, the coefficient of friction (CoF) was as low as with 10% chlorinated paraffin. With 5% inactive sulphurised triglyceride, it was on the same level than with 20% chlorinated paraffin. With only 5% of a special active sulphur carrier, based on olefin and triglyceride and containing 26% sulphur, the CoF was much lower than with 20% chlorinated paraffin (figure 5).


For all tested lubricant formulations, the required drawing forces were recorded over time (figure 6). During the complete drawing process, the necessary drawing force for the lubricant containing 5% sulphur carrier based on triglyceride and olefin was significantly lower than for 20% of the medium chain chlorinated paraffin. This also results in a reduction of energy need in the drawing process.


Summary Compared to other types of EP additives, sulphur carriers can achieve a significant reduction of energy consumption in metalworking processes. They are non-toxic to humans and to the environment. Many sulphur carriers show very low environmental impact and good sustainability. Sulphur based EP additives effectively reduce adhesive and abrasive wear and offer excellent performance even at high machining speeds which can be further improved by synergistic combinations with other additives. By using suitable sulphur carriers, the characteristics of metalworking fluids can be adjusted to the demands of specific metalworking processes and even exceed the performance of chlorinated paraffins containing cutting and forming lubricants.


[1] Based on: Manuela Erika Redecker, Kenngrößen der Energieeffizienz in der spanenden Fertigung, Doctoral Thesis, Technical University Graz, 2016


[2] Savvas Grammatikopoulos, Experimentelle Ermittlung des Einflusses von Schmierstoffadditiven auf das tribologische Verhalten beim Tiefziehen, Bachelor Thesis, Esslingen University of Applied Sciences, 2023


lanxess.com


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64