MY 2 CENTS By Randy Rowles
LIMITING ONE RISK BY INCREASING ANOTHER POWER-ON AUTOROTATIVE
DESCENT TRAINING
About a year ago, I was conducting pilot training for a Part 135 company that was a relatively new customer. Prior to FAA approval to conduct this training, I conducted a review of its Part 135 training program to determine its
differences from
our training. Most often, a VFR Part 135 helicopter operator’s training program is going to be quite like another. Of course, some differences will always exist. The question is whether those differences require additional training and checking.
During the review of this company’s training program, I noticed a statement regarding the conduct of autorotation training that said, “at no time shall the throttle be reduced during autorotation training maneuvers.” This immediately got my attention. My initial thought was: If you don’t close the throttle, how are you practicing autorotations?
I engaged the operator for a bit of clarity. I was advised that the company had previously incurred expenses due to an overspeed that occurred during power-off autorotation training, so a company decision was made to only lower the collective and simulate an autorotative descent profile. Is this even legal? was my initial thought. Not to mention all the attributes of a power-off autorotation, which may include high/low rotor rpm, glide variation, and the ability to recognize the initial onset of an engine failure.
I turned my thoughts on this topic into an articulable question and engaged the FAA for an answer. The immediate response from the FAA was one of disbelief and agreement. The FAA was clear when stating “the operator must reduce the throttle or how can you complete the power recovery requirement of the maneuver?” I was relieved. I’d found support from the FAA and now a remedy to the situation was soon to be had. Not so fast!
A few days later, I received a call from a helicopter-qualified FAA inspector whom I have known and worked with on many
8 July/Aug 2024
initiatives over the years. His call was to discuss this topic and curtail any concerns I had. The FAA believed this practice didn’t take away from safety or quality of training. The inspector provided details of his military training experience in the UH-60 Black Hawk, and how they never reduced the throttles during their autorotation training events. He stated his initial training was in a Bell TH-67 helicopter and that he had completed a multitude of autorotations during initial training. It was his belief that there is little difference between a power-on or power-off autorotative profile. My response: I couldn’t disagree more!
The thought that lowering the collective with power applied to the main rotor would provide equivalent training benefit is naïve at best, and in some cases ignorant of the elements involved in single-engine autorotation training.
The first major difference is recognition of an engine failure using the energy change or reaction of the airframe to the loss of power. It is the ability of the pilot to immediately recognize and react in this situation. This will ultimately allow the pilot to either successfully enter the power-off profile or lose the energy of the rotor rpm and not survive the event. Respecting that a trained and qualified helicopter pilot made the decision that these maneuvers were similar led me to ask, “How did this discussion come about?”
I was told that several operators incurred engine and rotor rpm overspeeds during autorotation training and preferred not to reduce throttle. It was the operators who believed conducting a power-on descent minimized both the chance of overspeeds due to throttle manipulation and reduced the risk of high-vertical speed accidents if the power remained on throughout the event.
Truth be told, reducing the collective in most helicopters with the throttle remaining in the power-on position will enhance the chance of an overspeed, not decrease it. Additionally in many
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
