search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INFRASTRUCTURE


polymer over an equivalent steel product achieves a 67 per cent reduction in carbon emissions.


Acoustic performance One of the most well-recognised factors influencing occupant wellbeing in healthcare facilities is acoustics, with 91 per cent of respondents to our survey citing it as ‘important’ or ‘very important’. Naturally, noise levels can have a significant impact on patient comfort, which in turn is key to facilitating a rehabilitative environment. Despite this, research from King’s


College London indicates that noise levels in intensive care units regularly exceed 100 decibels – roughly the equivalent of loud music being played through headphones. Additionally, in-patient surveys revealed that 40 per cent of patients are unhappy with noise levels on their ward. A higher rehospitalisation rate was also found among coronary care patients who were treated during noisy periods. The research team believe that the hospital soundscape must be considered as a whole, extending beyond alarms and machinery to low and intrusive sounds, such as keys in locks and the sound of water running through internal pipework. While addressing these sounds will not


prove a comprehensive solution, eliminating noise from controllable sources where possible will no doubt contribute to a calmer hospital environment. By adopting a granular approach to all aspects of building design, a number of possible contributors to noisy hospital environments can be removed.


Drinking water provision Another major factor of healthy building design is the safe provision of drinking water. Naturally, with a duty of care to patients within the facility, it is paramount that the supply of this utility does not present a contamination risk to those who may already be vulnerable. At present, the most popular materials


for heating and water pipes are copper and steel, reflecting metal’s position as the traditional choice for this application. When queried on their reasons for specifying these materials, respondents cited ‘fewer tools’ and ‘more hygienic’ among the most popular reasons. However, there is a growing case to


suggest that these metals are no longer the best choice for this application, and that copper and steel are not as hygienic as they may first seem. For instance, both of these solutions are more prone to microbial contamination compared to


polymer pipework and multilayer composite pipe (MLCP). Given that 83 per cent claimed that


they still specified fittings containing lead, material specification is critical, with this able to leach into drinking water supply. Furthermore, 42 per cent also claimed that they were ‘often’ victims of copper theft, indicating another risk that is invited when specifying this material. Here, there is potential for polymer to prove to be the successor to copper and steel.


Looking to the future The next seven years represent a period of opportunity for the healthcare sector. With 40 new facilities set to be constructed by the end of the decade, M&E designers and architects have now been presented with the chance to future- proof the nation’s medical infrastructure against current and future challenges. The considerations outlined here offer only a glimpse into what can be made possible through a more granular approach to healthy building design. By making informed choices on material specification, M&E designers and architects can help create health estates that are both sustainable and conducive to the provision of high-quality treatment for years to come.


IFHE


IFHEDigest Providing insights into the vast field of healthcare engineering and facility management IFHE DIGEST 2023 93


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97