search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL


Consistent sterilisation of reuseable medical devices


Healthcare facilities are committed to delivering high quality care in a safe environment to safeguard patients from avoidable harm.1


One area of paramount importance in protecting patients against infection is the decontamination and sterilisation function provided by the Central Sterile Services Department (CSSD). Here, Angelo Giambrone, Healthcare Business Development manager at Spirax Sarco UK, explores how decontamination leads and Authorising Engineers can drive improvements in steam quality to deliver reliable and consistent sterilisation of reusable medical devices. He also touches on what the future may hold for the Sterile Services Department ‘in a decarbonising world’.


Vulnerable hospital patients, often with compromised immune systems, are


Acquisition •Purchase •Loan


unfortunately at increased risk of infection. One report in the British Medical Journal stated that between 2016 and 2017, there were an estimated 653,000 healthcare-associated infections (HCAIs) among the 13.8 million adult inpatients in NHS general and teaching hospitals in England, of which 22,800 patients died as a result of their infection. HCAIs are closely monitored, and the data has been particularly scrutinised over the past year with the ongoing efforts to minimise the spread of COVID- 19. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) reported in 2016 that ‘the six most common types of healthcare-associated infections, which accounted for more than 80% of all HCAIs, were pneumonia and other respiratory infections (22.8%), urinary tract infections (17.2%), surgical site infections (15.7%), clinical sepsis (10.5%), gastrointestinal infections (8.8%), and bloodstream infections (7.3%)’.


G N I


At all stages Location Facilities Equipment Management


Policies/Procedures T


Disposal •Scrap


•Return to lender


Figure 1: The reusable surgical instrument lifecycle, as published in HTM 01-01, Management and decontamination of surgical instruments (medical devices) used in acute care.


As regards surgical site infections, there is guidance on the preparation of the surgical site, procedures during the operation, and post-operation care of the wound. One critical area in minimising risk of surgical site infection is in the effective decontamination of surgical equipment, and in particular ensuring that the equipment used in surgery is sterilised to the standards required by the industry. As a key infection control measure, decontamination is an ‘umbrella’ term used to describe the process of cleansing to remove contaminants such as microorganisms – making equipment safe


for reuse in operating theatres, clinics, A&E departments, and wards. There are three levels of decontamination within the healthcare environment – the first line of defence is general cleaning, the second is disinfection, and, finally, the third is sterilisation for the removal of viable infectious agents, including viruses and bacterial spores. Effective decontamination can be achieved by applying the appropriate actions at all stages of the decontamination lifecycle process (Fig 1).


The sterilisation element In this feature we will focus on the sterilisation element of the decontamination cycle. Steam provides the most reliable and efficient method of achieving effective sterilisation, which is why the healthcare industry standard for sterilisation is to use


steam, delivered at a specific pressure and temperature. It is a simple, fast, and safe way to decontaminate reusable medical devices such as surgical instruments. However, it is important to consider how the steam is produced and delivered to the sterilisers in order to ensure that the necessary quality standards are met, and to achieve a successful and repeatable outcome from every sterilisation cycle. The time taken for a cycle can depend on the steriliser and its contents. Another factor is the steam pressure. Steam temperature varies with pressure, and Health Technical Memorandum (HTM) 01-01 Part C (Table 1) indicates how steriliser holding times vary with steam temperature, in order to achieve sterilisation. Optimising sterilisation cycle


times of course has an impact on departmental efficiency, economy, and, most importantly, patient safety. Whatever steam pressure or cycle time is used, underpinning it all is the provision of high quality steam into the sterilisation process, to ensure that the desired quality of the end-product is reached.


Steam for safe sterilisation A recent global study of sterilisation facilities conducted by Spirax Sarco aimed to understand the key processing barriers to delivering successful sterilisation outcomes. One issue seen repeatedly around the world was the presence of ‘wet packs’, together with the associated actions of dealing with, and establishing, the root cause of the problem. The phenomenon is recognised and explained in HTM 01-01 4.113, as


April 2021 Health Estate Journal 37


U


S


N


E


R


T R


A


A


A


P


N


G


N


O


E


S


I


T


P


C


O


N


E


T R


I O


N S


C


R


L


P


T E


A E


O


S


N


R


D


A


I L


S


I


R


I S


I


T


A


F


N


T


I N


T S


K


S


A


P


G I


E C


N


T


G


I O


O


C


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68