search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
RESEARCH ▶▶▶


AI prevention and innovative biosecurity measures


Lasers are being trialled on a Dutch free-range poultry unit to see if they can remove the threat of avian influenza contamination from wild birds.


BY TONY MCDOUGAL R •


esearch into the use of lasers as a repellent for wild birds has been taking place since the 1970s, first as birdstrike prevention at airfields and then for dis- persing wild birds causing agri cultural crop damage.


Dr Armin Elbers, senior epidemi olo gist at Wageningen Uni- versity and Research, said the current study was looking at scaring wild ducks and other wild birds through a laser on a platform six metres above ground level. Speaking at an Inter- national Egg Commission (IEC) webinar, Dr Elbers said the free range area is lasered between 5pm and 10am, with the surrounding pasture (up to 600 metres away) lasered at the same times.


Preliminary results: •





No wild birds were seen during the day in the surrounding pastures when the laser was in operation. The poultry farmer described the lack of geese as “stunning”.


Far fewer Eurasian wigeons and mallards were encoun- tered in the large waterway about 250m away from the free-range area barn while the laser was operative.


Grass in the surrounding pastures was much more abun- dant due to the lack of geese feeding.


• Without the laser, wild ducks quickly returned to the waterway.


Dr Elbers mentioned that after the first night, there were no mallards present once the laser had been switched on. With- out the use of the laser, mallards visited virtually every night.


Other measures Other research taking place includes the use of fluorescent powders at different spots outside the poultry barn, such as on concrete slabs around the barn, on the roof, in the roof gutters (to mimic the AI virus attached to wild bird drop- pings), in order to follow the transport of the powder. Video camera monitoring inside and outside the poultry barn is also being used in the Netherlands to detect how mice and rats, as well as people and equipment enter the barn to try to ensure that biosecurity measures are not breached.


One of the first farms to use lasers to scare wild birds was based in the UK, but the method was quickly introduced in the Netherlands too.


42 ▶ POULTRY WORLD | No. 10, 2020


Persistent AI pressure Eric Hubers, chairman of the Dutch Poultry Farmers Associa- tion, said Dutch farmers faced regular outbreaks of highly pathogenic bird flu, which was persistent due to the nature of the country’s topography (lots of wetlands) and the extent of free-range production. Hubers said the Association was work- ing with AVINED, the Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality and the Dutch Society for the Protection of Animals to reduce the risk of outbreaks. As a result, an AI roadmap has been produced with 28 recommendations for producers cov- ering biosecurity, monitoring and early warning signs, vacci- nation options and reducing the consequences of an introduction.


PHOTO: CHRIS MCCULLOUGH


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44