search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
EDITOR’S TAKE


Seeing is Believing Written by Ryan Gray | ryan@stnonline.com F


or decades, law enforcement authorities and school transportation professionals have pains- takingly reconstructed school bus crashes to determine their exact causes. Some crashes are


relatively minor. Others, while more rare, result in signif- icant loss of property or worse. Such exercises continue to serve a valuable purpose in


determining speed, braking (or lack thereof), distraction, and other crash characteristics. But no amount of recon- struction is as good as watching what happened. This month’s cover captures the moment just prior to a cement pump truck striking a school bus in Bastrop County, Texas, just east of Austin. The incident was the second catastrophic school bus crash occurring within an 11-day span in March. The National Transportation Safety Board is already investigating the first fatal school bus crash, a head-on collision in Illinois on March 11 that resulted in the deaths of three pre-kindergarten students, their bus driver, and the truck driver. For this reason, the agency told me that it would not be investi- gating the Hays Consolidated Independent School Bus crash in Texas, that occurred on March 22. Both crashes were head-on collisions, and both


resulted from a driver veering across the center line. In the Illinois crash, news reports indicated the school bus driver drifted into the oncoming lane. There is no known video from that crash. The NTSB’s final investi- gation, which is expected sometime in the next year, will provide details. But we know the cruel, criminal reality in Texas. Video


released by Hays CISD in the days following the crash, and after the cement pump truck driver admitted to consuming cocaine hours earlier, shows exactly what occurred. The dashcam video captures the cement pump truck approach from the opposite lane, then sud- denly veer to its left and into the path of the school bus. A pre-K student died in that collision and resulting


rollover, as did another motorist who was trailing the bus. If not for the actions of the Hays CISD bus driver, the crash could have been worse. Her quick reaction to steer to the right likely saved more lives, especially her own. The cement pump driver, allegedly fell asleep at the wheel and doesn’t appear to brake. (The fact that the school bus was not equipped with integrated child safety seats is another matter.) NTSB has studied similar fatal school bus crashes in the


12 School Transportation News • MAY 2024


past, and its charter is to learn new lessons from different crash forces, like the one in Illinois, where both vehicles burst into flames soon after impact. The fact that all the victims died in the resulting fire dictated that NTSB focus its resources there, as the previous fatal school bus fire it investigated—2017 in Iowa—had more to do with a school bus driver who was physically unfit for duty. But the local investigation continues in Texas. Thanks to the on-board video camera footage, Hays CISD and the entire student transportation industry can learn valuable albeit heartbreaking lessons. I, like most readers, have not viewed the entire video


from all angles and channels, but I did watch about a couple of minutes of raw footage from the dashcam as well as from an external camera mounted on the right side of the bus. It included the audio, which STN re- moved before posting online. It’s one thing watching the cement pump truck veer into the path of the school bus. It’s quite another to hear children laughing and singing one second and screaming and crying next the next. More and more school buses are equipped with video cameras, but there are high-profile examples where vid- eo is lacking–exhibit 1 and 1a are the nation’s two largest school districts, New York City and Los Angeles, granted both are taking action to implement the technology. Of those school districts that are actively using video, how many have front-facing dash cams? No definitive study exists. But representatives from


several school bus video vendors told me that new system orders are increasingly including dash cams. One official told me that dash cams are essentially standard on all proj- ects the company has worked on for the past six years. The school districts and bus companies that are using dash cams find the video invaluable for driver training and coaching. They are supplementing camera systems capable of capturing all areas inside the bus to monitor student behavior as well as documenting the Danger Zone around the buses when loading and unloading students. While some incidents are unavoidable, there are


proactive lessons to be learned from the footage with live-saving benefits. ●


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60