search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Positive charge applied: The diagram below shows this: FEATURE Posiitive charge applied:


BioHygiene All Purpose Sanitiser


BioHygiene All Purpose Sanitiser


tive charge applied:


Surface, such as a table leg. Negatively Charged.


Surface, such as a table leg. Negatively Charged.


Compare that to a handheld fog, that is not positively charged, directed at the same surface:


Compare that to a handheld fog, that is not positively charged, directed at the same surface: Compare that to a handheld fog, that is not positively charged, directed at the same surface:


BioHygiene All Purpose Sanitiser


BioHygiene All Purpose Sanitiser


Surface, such as a table leg.


Surface, such as a table leg.


Electrostatic spraying versus fogging


Electrostatic spraying The application and PPE requirements are very similar to that when carrying out handheld fogging. The basis of electrostatic spraying is similar to fogging, but there is an important additional process that takes place. At the tip of the sprayer, as the sanitiser leaves, it is positively charged with an electrode.


As nearly every surface that we aim to sanitise has a negative charge, the positive charge that is applied therefore means that the negative surface magnetically attracts the positively charged sanitiser. This in turn causes a ‘wrap around’ affect, almost guaranteeing complete surface coverage.


Electrostatic spraying versus fogging


For an example of how this works, take a look at the diagrams above.


Electrostatic spraying versus fogging If targeting specific areas in-between client meetings,


www.tomorrowsfm.com


such as tables and chairs, or individual toilet cubicles throughout the day, then electrostatic spraying would be the preferred option as this method is prone to less atomisation of sanitiser and is a lesser risk to those in the same vicinity.


Fogging, however, is better suited to those areas that are vacant after hours, such as office buildings, restaurants and gyms. The benefits of fogging ensure complete sanitiser coverage of all surfaces rather than specifics.


It is important that you choose the correct form of disinfection for your business, and the health of your employees and customers. Take extra precaution when risk assessing the environment to be sanitised before deciding. In either application, the efficacy of the sanitiser is the same.


www.biohygiene.co.uk/ TOMORROW’S FM | 39


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68