search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
In it for the long haul


Paul Jakeway, Head of Marketing at Rubbermaid Commercial Products (RCP) EMEA, explains the need for long-term hand hygiene solutions.


In February and March 2020, many European countries entered lockdown periods. Businesses were required to close or drastically curtail operations. Advice to citizens was to stay at home, taking only essential trips for exercise or shopping.


National guidelines emphasised the role of hand hygiene in preventing the spread of COVID-19. Businesses and other spaces that remained open were under pressure to offer hand hygiene provisions, which coincided with the peak demand for hand sanitiser and hygiene products.


Rather than offering nothing, businesses implemented what they could. Often these solutions were functional; a bottle of hand sanitiser or a bulk fill station at the front door. Businesses had something in place, but urgency (and scarcity in some situations) affected the quality of provisions.


The Love Recycling Part 2 report found that as well as increased levels of PPE waste, almost 60% of businesses now consider hand hygiene a top priority. Understandable when the safety of staff and customers is paramount to the successful reopening of a business.


In the short term, this priority will remain prevalent across many sectors, but businesses need to prepare for the longer term with tailored, effective solutions. Businesses reopening or resuming full operations, cannot continue with the lockdown status quo.


Hand hygiene provisions will be a part of public life for the foreseeable future. Over time, customers will make choices based less on who has provisions, and more on who has the best provisions.


What do customers expect?


To support businesses with hand hygiene implementation, RCP undertook a research study with the public. In it, we aimed to discover their hand hygiene preferences. The questions covered expectations, attitudes, choices, behaviour and observations.


How does a lack of hand hygiene provisions affect their perceptions?


We asked respondents to describe a place with no hand sanitiser. The top responses were irresponsible, dangerous and unsafe. Other leading responses included careless and unclean.


These responses fall into two categories: perception of the space and perception of those operating it. Both are seen negatively, lacking caution and preparedness. In a correlated question, we asked about avoiding spaces. 60% said that they would consider avoiding a space with no hand sanitiser.


Where there are provisions, what type of sanitisers do people prefer to use?


38 | FEATURE


82% of respondents said that they preferred alcohol- based sanitisers over alcohol free, perhaps reflecting the public health messages that have been played back by the Government.


How, and where, do people prefer to get hand sanitiser?


Asked about dispensing options, a massive 93% of respondents prefer touch-free. This likely reflects prominent guidance on hand hygiene and touch as a source of transmission.


In many facilities, hand hygiene previously existed solely within the washroom or in areas with specific requirements such as healthcare facilities or back of house food service. Now, with hand hygiene occupying greater prominence, where do customers expect to see provisions?


In total, 90% of respondents expect provisions at least at the entrance. More than half say provisions should be available throughout a facility, as well as the front door. Entryways are a natural bottleneck to provide hand sanitiser, but customers and staff are looking for deployment that builds from the entrance.


Finally, it may seem obvious, but hand sanitiser needs to be well presented wherever it is placed. 70% would forego using the provided hand sanitiser if it looked unclean. It is reasonable to assume that some of this 70% would consider unusable provisions equal to no provisions. This may, in turn, lead to avoidance of the space.


What can businesses do?


We asked respondents about their personal provisions. Three quarters stated that they carry their own supply of hand sanitiser. While there are likely several factors influencing this behaviour, the general public are carrying their own supplies in part because they cannot depend on there being suitable options wherever they go. This emphasises the role businesses must play in supporting the public, and it also stresses the importance of implementing solutions that match the public’s expectations.


At the time of writing, countries in Europe are seeing COVID-19 case numbers increase. We will also soon begin the autumn and winter influenza season. To avoid the last resort measures of full lockdown being reimplemented, more needs to be done. Businesses are not solely responsible, but they have the opportunity to play a crucial role in keeping people safe.


To meet safety requirements and expectations, businesses need to change their solutions. Replace the immediately available short-term solutions with long term, manageable solutions.


Dedicated dispensers and touch-free stations meet several crucial customer expectations. People want touch-free


(www.loverecycling.com) (https://www.cdc.gov/handwashing/show-me-the-science-hand-sanitizer.html)


twitter.com/TomoCleaning


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88