search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
purchasing a hand dryer, the cost to install it and long term maintenance, hand dryers can prove much more costly than a


simple paper towel solution.


Designed to reduce


In washrooms servicing high footfalls of customers, longer drying times combined with the ability to only service one user at once can result in air hand dryers causing long queues and congestion, reducing the hygiene benefits of washing hands. By opting for quick-to- use paper towel solutions, such as the Lotus Professional® Marathon™ and enMotion® ranges, multiple users can dry their hands at the same time in less than 10 seconds, reducing washroom congestion.


Not only are washroom queues an inconvenience, damp hands spread bacteria 1,000 iv more than dry hands, meaning that the increase in time between washing and drying hands provides an ideal opportunity for bacteria and viruses to thrive. The hygiene risks of using hand dryers are also heightened by potentially passive contamination, caused by germs being blown into the air by air dryers. As a result it is important that washroom users have access to hygienic drying facilities so they can wash their hands quickly and easily to reduce the risk of bacteria spread on their hands.


Noise and wet floors


Paper towels are currently the quietest way for users to dry their hands. The noise generated by Air Dryers can be up to three times louder than an automated hand towel solution, arguably creating unnecessary noise pollution which could lead to stress, discomfort and even insecurities in staff.


When using air dryers, in some cases the water from the hands of washroom users can find its way onto the floor, pausing a potential health and safety risk to users as they make floors slippery. In addition, it can result in messy washroom areas, encouraging customer dissatisfaction and presenting a negative impression of your overall facilities.


When you consider the hygienic benefits of each drying methods and combine this with how many people they can service at one time and the noise and additional maintenance, paper towels continue to come out on top. Additionally, when you add up the cost of


usage, waste and limit cost in use, Lotus Professional® products are not only a cost and time efficient hand drying solution, paper towels are the only way to minimise queues, manage hygiene and ensure your washroom users benefit from washing their hands.


For more information about the Marathon™ range, the enMotion® range or any other Lotus Professional® products please call 0114 2856666, or visit www.lotusprofessional.co.uk


i. housekeepingsolutions magazine 2009 AMD study of the Consumer’s Attitudes to differnet hand drying systems INTERMETRA 2008


ii Westminster University: Comparative study of the different hand drying methods: paper towel, warm air dryer and jet air dryer, commissioned by the European Tissue Symposium www.europeantissue.com


iii University of Bradford: Comparative evaluation of the hygienic efficacy of an ultra-rapid hand dryer vs conventional warm air hand dryers (funded by Dyson limited)


iv University of Bradford: Comparative evaluation of the hygienic efficacy of an ultra-rapid hand dryer vs conventional warm air hand dryers (funded by Dyson


limited)


The future of our cleaning industry | TOMORROW’S CLEANING YEARBOOK 2012/2013 | 17 COVER STORY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96