46 Air Monitoring Modular high-precision nitrogen oxide analyser


Eco Physics’ nCLDAL3 /8555 CY analyser is at the forefront of high precision nitrogen oxide measurement. Offering an unsurpassed level of speed and reliability, this analyser has a convenient modular design and can measure NO, NO2, NOX, NH3 and NOX-Amines simultaneously. The intuitive graphical user interface individually displays and connects to other instruments’ data.


The versatile and user-friendly nCLD AL3/8555 CY offers everything needed for instant, simultaneous measurement of NO, NO2, NOX, NH3 and NOX-Amines. The updated detector-block, the signifi cantly improved gas fl ow paths and the enhanced pressure and temperature independence of this dependable series of instruments enable even lower detection limits. Overall stability and reliability have been raised to a new level; the optional electro-mechanical bypass system balances out even the fastest pressure variations occurring within the sample fl ow. In addition, the nCLD AL3/8555 CY can be adapted to cater to a plethora of non-standard applications. Calibrating the instrument is rapid and automatic with all the requisite data available anywhere and anytime.


More information online: ilmt.co/PL/BBBK


For More Info, email: email:


Since its fi rst outing in 1997, CEM has established itself as one of Europe’s leading forums on emissions monitoring, showcasing innovation and fostering collaboration in the interest of creating a cleaner environment for all. With CEM 2023, our 25th anniversary and our biggest yet, already fully booked six months ahead of the event, anticipation is already building for the next instalment. As such, we are thrilled to announce CEM Europe 2025, which will take place from 24th to 26th September in Slovenia’s vibrant capital, Ljubljana.


As always, CEM 2025 promises attendees a deep dive into the newest regulations, cutting-edge technologies and best practices in emissions monitoring with a global scope. Expect unparalleled networking opportunities, connecting with industry veterans and pioneering researchers as well as leading CEMs equipment and service providers. It’s an unmissable opportunity to garner unparalleled insight on regulation, best practices and the cutting edge of emissions monitoring technologies.


For More Info, email: email:


In many ways, Ljubljana offers the perfect backdrop for this event. Famed for its landscapes, its rich and lovingly preserved heritage, this icon of Central Europe is renowned for its commitment to sustainability and environmental health, too, having been awarded the title of European Green Capital in recent years. Successful pedestrianisation, the beautiful Ljubljanica and an emphasis on green public space make Ljubljana an apt and inspiring location for discussions of emissions monitoring. Even better, in their down-time, attendees will have gems of European history, like Ljubljana Castle and the Old Town, within arm’s reach.


For More Info, email: email:


With our track record, early bookings are strongly advised. So, if you’re interested in exhibiting at CEM Europe 2025, head to: www.ilmexhibitions.com/cem/cem-2025-stand-booking/


For More Info, email: email:


How close is the European Union to banning PFAS? the industry’s infl uence on health and policy matters.


For More Info, email: email:


In a tug-of-war between public health concerns and industrial pressures, the European Union (EU) seems on the brink of reneging on its commitment to limit the use of certain hazardous chemicals, chiefl y the per- and polyfl uoroalkyl substances (PFAS), often dubbed ‘forever chemicals’.


For More Info, email: email:


A leaked document suggests that the European Commission may backtrack on its initial proposal, outlined in the European Green Deal of 2020, to ban the use of the most harmful chemicals in consumer products, barring their utilization only where essential. The proposal aimed to prohibit the use of 7,000 to 12,000 harmful substances in all marketable items, including PFAS, which pose an ecological and human health hazard. However, recent information points towards a signifi cant dilution of this policy under the infl uence of chemical industry lobbyists and conservative political factions.


PFAS have been associated with a host of health disorders, including hormonal disruption, reproductive diffi culties, and various forms of cancer. These substances have an alarming ability to persist in the environment and human bodies for extended periods, earning them the nickname ‘forever chemicals’.


However, despite the recognized health hazards, the European Commission seems on the precipice of diluting its regulatory stance under the weight of Europe’s chemical industry lobby and right-wing political factions. The pushback from industry stakeholders is causing internal strife within the EU bureaucracy, with some offi cials expressing disquiet over


The confi dential legislative document seen by the Guardian presents three alternatives, limiting 1%, 10%, or 50% of marketable products containing hazardous chemicals. Based on past tendencies, the EU is likely to opt for the median choice.


Environmental activists and public health advocates have voiced their concerns over the EU’s softening stance on harmful chemicals. Tatiana Santos, head of the chemicals policy at the European Environmental Bureau, warned that every delay in regulating harmful substances increases the risk of disease, premature mortality, and public cynicism towards the EU’s commitment to a green transition.


The draft of a 77-page impact study, intended as part of the revision of targets in the EU’s Reach regulation, dated 13 January 2023, outlines the health and economic benefi ts of restricting harmful chemicals. According to the study, the health savings from chemical bans would outweigh industry costs by a factor of 10. The annual health care savings associated with diseases such as cancer and obesity would total between €11bn-€31bn (£9.4bn-£26.5bn), while the industry’s adjustment costs would range from €0.9bn-€2.7bn.


Adding to the urgency of this matter is the widespread exposure to PFAS. Studies have discovered these chemicals in alarming proportions among European populations, revealing links to developmental and reproductive health issues. Dr Marike Kolossa-Gehring, the study’s coordinator, revealed that more than 34m tonnes of carcinogenic,


61160pr@reply-direct.com 61166pr@reply-direct.com Europe’s premier conference and exhibition on emissions monitoring will return in 2025


TALKING POINT


mutagenic, and reprotoxic substances were consumed in Europe in 2020.


Despite these startling revelations, eff orts to revise the Reach regulation have been hindered by internal disagreements within the commission, and an apparent shift in support away from consumer and environmental protections. As industry pressure mounts and political alliances shift, the future of PFAS regulation hangs in the balance.


Notably, several EU heads of state have joined the debate. French President Emmanuel Macron has called for a pause in environmental regulations to assist industry, while Belgian Prime Minister Alexander De Croo has cautioned that over-regulation might jeopardize public support for the green agenda.


Lobbying eff orts by the chemical industry have been eff ective, with the German chemicals giant BASF blaming “overregulation” for its decision to downsize permanently in Europe. The VCI, Germany’s industry association, argued for a risk-based approach to regulation, advocating for the postponement of the chemical ban, which they claim would have disastrous eff ects on the German industry.


The debate over the regulation of PFAS and other harmful chemicals underscores the challenges facing the European Union as it seeks to balance its commitment to environmental sustainability, public health, and industrial growth. With powerful lobby groups, political factions, and internal bureaucratic dynamics infl uencing the policy trajectory, the future of PFAS regulation remains uncertain.


IET SEPTEMBER / OCTOBER 2023


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60