A new Off-Grid Solar Power Pack is now available to power the Aquamonitrix®
real-time nitrate and nitrite analyser for high-frequency monitoring of surface and groundwater in the fi eld. AQUAMONITRIX® GOES UNPLUGGED FOR OFF-GRID NITRATE AND
For studies of nitrate movement through catchments and aquifers to provide meaningful information, they need to accurately capture the impact of local conditions, such as rainfall, fl ooding and drought; soil type, pH and microbiology; ground coverage and the underlying geology. This, in turn, requires high-resolution data. But gathering suffi ciently high-quality and high-frequency data in the fi eld isn’t always easy.
Addressing nitrate monitoring challenges
“When we spoke to environmental and catchment scientists, many expressed frustration about the amount of recalibration and intervention required to maintain their ion-selective electrode-based analysers within an acceptable accuracy range,” said Aquamonitrix Director John McGrath. “Others said that while their UV nitrate analysers were based in monitoring huts or kiosks, they needed to be out in the fi eld, performing nitrate measurements where the problems were – not just where they happened to have a monitoring station.”
“With the Aquamonitrix® real-time nitrate and nitrite analyser, we have addressed these issues. The
analyser is lightweight, portable and can run on either mains power or a solar unit we have developed for long-term, ‘off-grid’ monitoring. It can perform a complete sample and analysis run as frequently as every 10 to 15 minutes, and all the readings are instantaneously transmitted to the user’s PC.”
In terms of ease of use, after an initial, once-off set-up, the calibration remains stable – even if the analyser is moved to a different sample matrix. The only intervention required is an occasional, simple fi ve-minute procedure to top-up the eluent and empty the sample waste container.
Case study #1 Pollution source identifi ed through nitrite detection
Dr Paul O’Callaghan is a catchment scientist with Ireland’s Local Authority Water Programme (LAWPRO) for the South-West Region.
The territory he covers encompasses Rosscarbery – a coastal village in West Cork with a tourist industry and an operational fi shing harbour, surrounded by pastoral land and several milk-processing co-ops. The area is of ‘moderate’ concern for nitrate, with the harbour impacted by intermittent algae blooms and the smell of rotting algae during summer months.
Dr O’Callaghan explains that the role of LAWPRO is not to police environmental compliance but to identify the issues causing water-quality problems. “We want to understand more about the source and behaviour of nitrogen in the catchment so we can provide better advice about best practice management strategies to keep nutrients in the fi elds and out of our water systems. This is the win-win outcome everyone wants, and we are working to achieve it through awareness, education and collaboration.”
The team was already using a mains-powered Aquamonitrix® analyser to quantify the nitrate load entering the estuary at Rosscarbery. So, the location was ideal to test the performance of the new solar- power pack, using a second unit to perform ‘off-grid’ monitoring.
Figure 1: shows nitrate concentrations in October/November 2021
Within a fortnight of using the mobile analyser, O’Callaghan picked up elevated nitrite concentrations of 1.58 mg/L (as NO2
-) in tandem with
typical nitrate levels for the river (of 8.66 mg/L as NO3
of the area revealed the source of the nitrite to be a leaking storage tank on a farm approximately 1km upstream, and this was confi rmed with grab samples.
“Finding nitrite didn’t patricianly surprise me,” he says. “When you have ammonia and nitrate, you can expect that nitrite will be in there somewhere.
Figure 2: shows the nitrite spikes. had already oxidised to nitrate,” he adds. “But our mobile Aquamonitrix®
“By the time the river reached our fi xed-position analyser at the entrance to the harbour, the nitrite unit revealed that the
nitrite pulse persisted for about1km downstream from its source. That would indicate nitrite is less transient than many models suggest.”
For further information, contact John McGrath, Sales Director Email
info@aquamonitrix.com,
www.aquamonitrix.com
-). An assessment
NITRITE MONITORING IN CATCHMENT AND BOREHOLE STUDIES Unique design overcomes problems
This performance is achieved through the combination of two technologies. “Our researchers selected UV- LED based detection, because of the lower power requirements compared with conventional UV lamps,” McGrath explains. “But to provide truly bullet-proof, intervention-free monitoring, they knew that UV-LED alone would be insuffi cient. Outside a laboratory environment, it would require all sorts of compensation and correction algorithms and complex calibration processes. That is why Aquamonitrix® detection with the separation capabilities of ion chromatography.”
The role of the rapid ion chromatography column is to separate out any organics and act as a trap for turbidity, colour and air bubbles, which are common sources of interference in real-world environments.
Signifi cantly, the column also slows the nitrate anion, allowing any nitrite present to reach the UV-LED detector more quickly, so that both anions are measured separately, providing highly accurate and specifi c readings for both nitrate and nitrite – even when nitrate levels are high.
The portability, stability and ease-of-use advantages of Aquamonitrix® are easily appreciated. Given the
importance of the nitrite intermediate in the progressive oxidation of ammonia to nitrate, the ability to measure both ions independently is also valued in wastewater treatment studies and in recirculating aquaculture systems, where the acute toxicity of nitrite is a signifi cant risk to fi sh health.
However, because nitrite has been so diffi cult to measure with high-frequency in the fi eld, the benefi ts in catchment and groundwater observation studies are less well understood, and sometimes the convenient assumption is that nitrite’s metastable presence can be safely disregarded. But the recent experiences of a number of Aquamonitrix®
users now challenge that view. Case study #2 Lifting a Nitrite-Related ‘Do Not Consume’ notice
A second instance involved a water utility forced to issue a ‘Do Not Consume’ notice due to nitrite exceedances in the fi nal water leaving one of its smaller drinking-water treatment plants. “On becoming aware of the nitrite monitoring capabilities of Aquamonitrix®
, the company contacted
us, and we were able to help them move forward quickly,” John McGrath explains. “As the analyser does not need to be permanently plumbed or wired into place, we had it up, running and delivering results in less than an hour of arriving on site and unboxing the unit.”
Over the following six weeks, Aquamonitrix®
The close agreement with laboratory results, and the fact that there were no further nitrite exceedances, allowed the company to lift the Do Not Consume notice, following consultation and agreement with the Health Authority.
“This was a success story all around,” McGrath says. “Having had the ‘Do Not Consume’ notice in place for the previous 22 weeks, the community had its water supply restored, and the company no longer had to supply bottled water for drinking, food preparation and dental hygiene.”
“If a water company needs to install a continuous monitor at the outlet of a drinking water treatment plant, then it makes sense for them to choose the Aquamonitrix®
achieved an average accuracy of over 95%, compared to the results of grab samples analysed for nitrate and nitrite in an accredited laboratory.
combines UV-LED
Figure 3: shows real-time nitrate levels.
nitrate and nitrite
analyser rather than a standard system that can just measure nitrate,” he adds. “Even if nitrite isn’t currently an issue, there are no additional costs or burdens associated with the simultaneous measurement, and they are future- proofed should nitrite become an issue down the line.”
Figure 4: shows real-time nitrite levels in February 2022. The grey lines show the statutory limits for drinking water leaving a treatment plant.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68