search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
UK Focus - Water/Wastewater xiii Water Quality Monitors Now Have Ammonium and Fluoride Capability


Intellitect Water (UK) has announced that ammonium and fluoride sensors have been added to the range of parameters available on the company's Intellisonde™ water quality monitors.


Recent advances in monitoring technology have enabled the measurement of water quality at the point of delivery through the direct insertion of specially designed 'Intellisondes™' into distribution pipes. Initial units were able to measure a range of water quality parameters (including chlorine) but both fluoride and ammonium have now been added to the list.


Intellitect's Technical Director, David Vincent believes that this new facility will be of great value to water companies, adding, "Both species are naturally present in drinking water, however, fluoride levels in drinking water are tightly regulated for oral health purposes and ammonium levels are of interest for two reasons. Firstly, they can indicate contamination of sanitary significance and secondly, they can form part of a disinfection process to form chloramine which maintains chlorine in the distribution system.


"The key feature of the new sensors is their size; the whole sonde, containing all of the sensors, fits inside a 1½ inch valve so the sensors, which are Ion Selective Electrodes, are very small."


It was from observing different patterns of dental decay in areas of differing levels of naturally fluoridated water that the benefits of fluoride were first observed. Currently around six million people in England receive water which either has had its level of fluoride adjusted to, or has a natural fluoride content of around 1 mg/l. The Guideline Value suggested by the World Health Organisation, dependent on local conditions, is 1.5mg/l of Fluoride.


At present, drinking water quality is mostly measured at the treatment plant, but with the arrival of Intellisondes™, real-time measurements can now be taken at any point in the distribution network and with the addition of both Fluoride and Ammonium to the choice of sensors, Water Companies will be able to further improve both the efficiency of treatment processes and the reliability of the delivered product.


Optical Dissolved Oxygen Technology Outperforms Traditional Methods


Three methods are generally used to measure dissolved oxygen (DO) in surface waters: Winkler titration, membrane-covered electrochemical sensors (polarographic or galvanic cell), and optical-based sensors. The optical technology for measuring DO levels in water has quickly become a well-accepted method due to many advantages over membrane sensors, and its close correlation to Winkler titrations.


Optical DO sensors rely on lifetime-based luminescence technology to accurately measure DO levels in- situ. If an oxygen-specific lumiphore is illuminated with a blue LED, it causes the lumiphore molecules embedded in the


Reader Reply Card no 255


gas-permeable sensing foil to emit red photons. DO acts as a dynamic luminescence quencher, therefore the lifetime of luminescence is inversely proportional to the DO concentration. Optical sensors are especially accurate below 2 ppm—a range in which most membrane sensors routinely give poor results. When monitoring anoxia in open bodies of water, achieving accurate readings below 2 ppm allows researchers to reliably characterise nutrient-related hypoxic zones. Optical DO sensors do not consume oxygen as part of an electrochemical reaction, and do not require sample flow for accurate readings.


COD in 10 Minutes


Camlab (UK) has launched a revolutionary instrument from Aqua Diagnostic, which is capable of accurate, sensitive, real-time analysis of Chemical Oxygen Demand. The new green technology requires no hazard- ous chemicals, produces fast results and eliminates the time consuming digestion step. The core of the technology is the PeCOD™ sensor which has a number of practical advantages compared with the traditional methods of COD analysis. PeCOD's ability to analyse samples containing chloride is significantly better than the dichromate method, and does not require the addition of toxic reagents like mercury and silver salts. The increased sensitivity of the method enables the measurement of clean water samples with low ppm levels of COD. Typical analysis times of less than 10 minutes are easily achieved. The sensor consists of a UV-activated titanium dioxide film coupled to an external circuit. The high oxidising power of the sensor gives the analyser a significant advantage compared with the traditional dichromate method. The PeCOD™ COD analyser exhaust- ively oxidises all organics, and counts the electrons that are liberated to provide a direct measure of equivalent COD. The PeCOD™ analyser is avail- able as a true on-line monitor or can be supplied as a benchtop labora-tory instrument, which has an optional battery pack for field use. The PeCOD™ technology allows the user to rapidly measure COD online in real time and enables a reading to be generated every 15 minutes to give unrivalled data on a waste or discharge stream. The online real time capability means that processes can be adjusted to reduce energy use or to make treat- ment more cost effective.


Reader Reply Card no 256


Optical sensing technology has been proven in multiple field studies to give accurate data over long deployment periods—with minimal maintenance and calibration requirements. Maintenance and material costs are drastically reduced, and site visits are minimised. Data is especially accurate in anoxic conditions with accuracy in normal environmental DO ranges as good or better than traditional membrane sensors. Additionally, sensor response time is faster, and the sensing element is more durable and has a longer operational life than an oxygen permeable membrane.


According to the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) International, the luminescence-based DO sensor method (D888-05, Test Method C) is an acceptable method for measuring DO. For more information on optical DO technology and on robust, accurate RDO®


sensors for groundwater, surface water, and process applications, please visit www.in-situ.com Reader Reply Card no 257


Reliable, accurate water level monitoring


Instrument Family


   


Application/technical notes and product specifications available at www.in-situ.com


From the Water Level Experts: In-Situ® Inc. CALL 07958 236100 TO ARRANGE A DEMONSTRATION  WWW.IN-SITU.COM Reader Reply Card no 259


Annual Buyers Guide 2009


IET


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128