search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Analytical Instrumentation Table 2. Instrumental Parameters and Conditions


Parameter Nebuliser


Spray Chamber RF Power Torch


Injector


Plasma Gas Flow Aux. Gas Flow


Nebuliser Gas Flow Torch Position Plasma View


Sample Uptake Rate Value


GemCone™ (modified Babbington)


Baffled glass cyclonic 1500 W


3-slot torch for organics 1.2 mm ceramic 10 L/min 0.8 L/min 0.40 L/min -4


Radial


1.60 mL/min (Avio 500) 2.0 mL/min (Avio 200)


Sample Uptake Tubing Black/Black (0.76 mm id), Viton Drain Tubing Read Delay


16 sec (Avio 500) 18 sec (Avio 200)


Replicates


Rinse Time Between Samples


Read Time Range 2


None with ASXpress (Avio 500) 12 sec at 6 mL/min (Avio 200)


0.5-2 sec (Avio 500) 0.2-1 sec (Avio 200)


to minimise sample uptake and washout times. Combining the ASXpress with the simultaneous ICP-OES, sample-to-sample analysis time is 25 seconds – ideal for high throughput labs.


Figure 1 shows the concentrations of seven elements in 10 randomly selected samples (although 23 elements were measured for each sample, only seven elements are shown for clarity). These data clearly show variations between samples, as well as the range of concentrations measured: from 1 ppm to greater than 1000 ppm. While most elements vary greatly between samples, the phosphorus concentration is relatively constant, demonstrating that the methodology is capable of detecting both large and small changes, sample-to-sample.


Table 3. Final QC Check Samples of a 20-Sample Analytical Run with the Avio 200 ICP-OES (hybrid scanning)


Final QC Element Al


Ag B


Ba Ca Cd Cr


Cu Fe K


Mg Mo Mn Na Ni P


Pb Sb Si


Sn Ti V


Zn


Concentration (ppm)


50 48 54 49 45 50 50 50 53 49 46 49 49 49 49 46 50 50 48 49 50 49 47


% Recovery


100 96


108 98 90


100 100 100 106 98 92 98 98 98 98 92


100 100 96 98


100 98 94


Figure 2. QC stability during a 6-hour analytical run of 332 in-service oil samples with the Avio 500 ICP-OES (simultaneous).


Author Contact Details Author: Ken Neubauer, PerkinElmer, Inc. • 710 Bridgeport Ave, Shelton, CT 06484, USA • Tel 001-203-925-4600 • Email: Kenneth.Neubauer@perkinelmer.com • www.perkinelmer.com


To assess the stability of the method, 332 in-service oil samples were analysed, along with QC standards every 11 samples, over 6 hours. The plot in Figure 2 shows the stability for the QC standards, where all elements recovered within 10% of the true value. The results demonstrate the robustness and stability of simultaneous ICP-OES in accordance with ASTM D5185 in a high- throughput environment. An important factor for achieving this stability is the incorporation of a vertical torch which allows non- ionised samples to drain back down the torch rather than pooling in the injector, causing carbon build-up on both the injector and torch.


The stability for the hybrid scanning ICP-OES was determined by measuring the QC samples both at the beginning and end of


a run consisting of 20 in-service oil samples. The results of the last QC sample appear in Table 3 and show that all elements recovered within +/- 10% of true value, meeting the acceptance criteria of typical in-service oil labs. These results demonstrate the stability of the methodology, allowing a low-volume, in-service oil lab to easily perform their daily analyses with a hybrid scanning ICP-OES.


Conclusion


This work has demonstrated the ability of both hybrid scanning and simultaneous ICP-OES instruments to measure in-service oil samples in accordance with ASTM method D5185 in both low and high-throughput environments to meet the specific needs of the lab. Sample throughput is maximized for both instruments by using an enhanced throughput sample introduction system, which eliminates the rinse time between samples. Both accuracy and stability are achieved, showing that ICP-OES is the ideal technique for the analysis of metals in in-service oils.


References


1. ASTM D5185 “Standard Test Method for Multielement Determination of Used and Unused Lubricating Oils and Base Oils by Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry”, ASTM.


Red/Red (1.14 mm id), SolvaFlex Figure 1. Concentrations of Al, B, Ca, P, Si, and Zn in 10 randomly selected in-service oil samples with the Avio 500 ICP-OES (simultaneous).


5


ANNUAL BUYERS GUIDE • WWW.PETRO-ONLINE.COM


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100